On Fri, 27 Sep, at 05:46:07PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> Given that we have already successfully called exit_boot_services, can
> we still make this call to free_pool?
Urgh, good point. The answer is "no, not really".
I'll add your change verbatim and push out the 'next' branch again.
--
Matt
On Fri, 27 Sep, at 05:46:07PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
Given that we have already successfully called exit_boot_services, can
we still make this call to free_pool?
Urgh, good point. The answer is no, not really.
I'll add your change verbatim and push out the 'next' branch again.
--
Matt
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:34:00PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > I might add the following to your merge for semantic reasons:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> > b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> > index 04b228d..a7677ba 100644
> > ---
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:34:00PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
I might add the following to your merge for semantic reasons:
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
index 04b228d..a7677ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
+++
On Wed, 25 Sep, at 04:45:41PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Sep, at 07:59:08PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> > > This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
> > > when booting using the EFI stub, which
On Wed, 25 Sep, at 04:45:41PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep, at 07:59:08PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
when booting using the EFI stub, which results in
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sep, at 07:59:08PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> > This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
> > when booting using the EFI stub, which results in overflowing e820_map
> > in boot_params and an
On Sun, 22 Sep, at 07:59:08PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
> when booting using the EFI stub, which results in overflowing e820_map
> in boot_params and an eventual halt when checking the map size in
> sanitize_e820_map().
>
> If
On Sun, 22 Sep, at 07:59:08PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
when booting using the EFI stub, which results in overflowing e820_map
in boot_params and an eventual halt when checking the map size in
sanitize_e820_map().
If the
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep, at 07:59:08PM, Linn Crosetto wrote:
This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
when booting using the EFI stub, which results in overflowing e820_map
in boot_params and an eventual
This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
when booting using the EFI stub, which results in overflowing e820_map
in boot_params and an eventual halt when checking the map size in
sanitize_e820_map().
If the number of map entries is greater than what can fit in
This patch fixes a problem with EFI memory maps larger than 128 entries
when booting using the EFI stub, which results in overflowing e820_map
in boot_params and an eventual halt when checking the map size in
sanitize_e820_map().
If the number of map entries is greater than what can fit in
12 matches
Mail list logo
