On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:56:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
> > itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
> > When
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:56:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
> > itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
> > When an architecture only
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
> itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
> When an architecture only needs to override a single hook, it must copy
>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
> itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
> When an architecture only needs to override a single hook, it must copy
> the stub
Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
When an architecture only needs to override a single hook, it must copy
the stub implementations from the asm-generic version.
To avoid this repetition,
Currently, an architecture must either implement all of the mm hooks
itself, or use all of those provided by the asm-generic implementation.
When an architecture only needs to override a single hook, it must copy
the stub implementations from the asm-generic version.
To avoid this repetition,
6 matches
Mail list logo