Hi,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:54:23PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Brown
>
>> > Why would that be helpful? Most platforms don't support DT at all, and
>
>> I'm not sure how to put it correctly.
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:58:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > BTW, OTOH writing all children into the DT actually describes the HW,
> > no ? And depending on the device I feel it'd be better to write that
>
> Well, it
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> BTW, OTOH writing all children into the DT actually describes the HW,
> no ? And depending on the device I feel it'd be better to write that
Well, it depends on the hardware. Some hardware has a bunch of nice,
neat IPs which can
Hi,
coming late to the discussion, so bear with me
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This means mfd framework does not have an API to create a device from
> > dt data or so do I think since of_platform_populate() is used. Thats
> > why I suggested the idea of
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:54:23PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Brown
> > Why would that be helpful? Most platforms don't support DT at all, and
> I'm not sure how to put it correctly. All I'm trying to tell is mfd is
> a framework that exposes a
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:54:23PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Brown
Why would that be helpful? Most platforms don't support DT at all, and
I'm not sure how to put it correctly. All I'm trying to tell is mfd is
a framework that exposes a set of
Hi,
coming late to the discussion, so bear with me
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
This means mfd framework does not have an API to create a device from
dt data or so do I think since of_platform_populate() is used. Thats
why I suggested the idea of extending
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
BTW, OTOH writing all children into the DT actually describes the HW,
no ? And depending on the device I feel it'd be better to write that
Well, it depends on the hardware. Some hardware has a bunch of nice,
neat IPs which can
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:58:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
BTW, OTOH writing all children into the DT actually describes the HW,
no ? And depending on the device I feel it'd be better to write that
Well, it depends on
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:54:23PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Brown
Why would that be helpful? Most platforms don't support DT at all, and
I'm not sure
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:23:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mark Brown
>
>> > No, this is not at all sensible - if there's an mfd_remove_devices()
>> > function we really ought to be able to use
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:23:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mark Brown
> > No, this is not at all sensible - if there's an mfd_remove_devices()
> > function we really ought to be able to use it to remove the children.
> > If we can't do that we should
Hi Sourav,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:31:22PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> smsc ece1099 is a keyboard scan or gpio expansion device.
> The patch create keypad and gpio expander child for this
> multi function smsc driver.
>
> Tested on omap5430 evm with 3.6-rc6 custom kernel.
>
> Cc: Samuel
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>
> Delete irrelevant context from your replies, it makes it much easier to
> find new text.
>
>> > +static int
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
Delete irrelevant context from your replies, it makes it much easier to
find new text.
> > +static int smsc_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
> > +{
> > + struct
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> smsc ece1099 is a keyboard scan or gpio expansion device.
> The patch create keypad and gpio expander child for this
> multi function smsc driver.
>
> Tested on omap5430 evm with 3.6-rc6 custom kernel.
Can we have this line in comment
smsc ece1099 is a keyboard scan or gpio expansion device.
The patch create keypad and gpio expander child for this
multi function smsc driver.
Tested on omap5430 evm with 3.6-rc6 custom kernel.
Cc: Samuel Ortiz
Cc: Benoit Cousson
Cc: Felipe Balbi
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar
Signed-off-by: Sourav
smsc ece1099 is a keyboard scan or gpio expansion device.
The patch create keypad and gpio expander child for this
multi function smsc driver.
Tested on omap5430 evm with 3.6-rc6 custom kernel.
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com
Cc: Felipe Balbi
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com wrote:
smsc ece1099 is a keyboard scan or gpio expansion device.
The patch create keypad and gpio expander child for this
multi function smsc driver.
Tested on omap5430 evm with 3.6-rc6 custom kernel.
Can we have this
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com wrote:
Delete irrelevant context from your replies, it makes it much easier to
find new text.
+static int smsc_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
+{
+
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com wrote:
Delete irrelevant context from your replies, it makes it
Hi Sourav,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:31:22PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
smsc ece1099 is a keyboard scan or gpio expansion device.
The patch create keypad and gpio expander child for this
multi function smsc driver.
Tested on omap5430 evm with 3.6-rc6 custom kernel.
Cc: Samuel Ortiz
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:23:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mark Brown
No, this is not at all sensible - if there's an mfd_remove_devices()
function we really ought to be able to use it to remove the children.
If we can't do that we should fix the
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:23:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mark Brown
No, this is not at all sensible - if there's an mfd_remove_devices()
function we
24 matches
Mail list logo
