Hi,
23. Juni 2016 06:52 Uhr, "Darren Hart" schrieb:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:03:18AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>
>> Because several drivers do the following pattern:
>> .set_mode()
>> ...
>> local_data->mode = new_mode;
>> thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
>>
>>
Hi,
23. Juni 2016 06:52 Uhr, "Darren Hart" schrieb:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:03:18AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>
>> Because several drivers do the following pattern:
>> .set_mode()
>> ...
>> local_data->mode = new_mode;
>> thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
>>
>> makes sense to simply do
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:23:22PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Eduardo,
>
> as the locking patch set has not been in upstream yet, you should
> either fold this fix into patch 02/15, or rebase your locking patch
> series on top of this fix.
I am folding into 02/15 and resending only the new
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:23:22PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Eduardo,
>
> as the locking patch set has not been in upstream yet, you should
> either fold this fix into patch 02/15, or rebase your locking patch
> series on top of this fix.
I am folding into 02/15 and resending only the new
Hi, Eduardo,
as the locking patch set has not been in upstream yet, you should
either fold this fix into patch 02/15, or rebase your locking patch
series on top of this fix.
thanks,
rui
On 三, 2016-06-22 at 08:03 -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Because several drivers do the following pattern:
Hi, Eduardo,
as the locking patch set has not been in upstream yet, you should
either fold this fix into patch 02/15, or rebase your locking patch
series on top of this fix.
thanks,
rui
On 三, 2016-06-22 at 08:03 -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Because several drivers do the following pattern:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:03:18AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Because several drivers do the following pattern:
> .set_mode()
>...
>local_data->mode = new_mode;
>thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
>
> makes sense to simply do the thermal_zone_device_update()
> in thermal core,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:03:18AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Because several drivers do the following pattern:
> .set_mode()
>...
>local_data->mode = new_mode;
>thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
>
> makes sense to simply do the thermal_zone_device_update()
> in thermal core,
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 08:33 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
Because several drivers do the following pattern:
.set_mode()
...
local_data->mode = new_mode;
thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
makes sense to simply do the thermal_zone_device_update()
in thermal core, after setting the
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 08:33 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
Because several drivers do the following pattern:
.set_mode()
...
local_data->mode = new_mode;
thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
makes sense to simply do the thermal_zone_device_update()
in thermal core, after setting the
Because several drivers do the following pattern:
.set_mode()
...
local_data->mode = new_mode;
thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
makes sense to simply do the thermal_zone_device_update()
in thermal core, after setting the new mode.
Also, this patch also remove deadlocks on drivers that
Because several drivers do the following pattern:
.set_mode()
...
local_data->mode = new_mode;
thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
makes sense to simply do the thermal_zone_device_update()
in thermal core, after setting the new mode.
Also, this patch also remove deadlocks on drivers that
12 matches
Mail list logo