Dear Eduardo,
On 08/30/2014 04:28 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Chanwoo,
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:50:41AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Dear Eduardo,
>>
>> On 08/28/2014 11:53 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Dear Eduardo,
Chanwoo,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:50:41AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Eduardo,
>
> On 08/28/2014 11:53 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >> Dear Eduardo,
> >>
> >> This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
> >>
> >> Please ignore
Chanwoo,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:50:41AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Dear Eduardo,
On 08/28/2014 11:53 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Dear Eduardo,
This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
Please ignore only this patch
Dear Eduardo,
On 08/30/2014 04:28 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
Chanwoo,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:50:41AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Dear Eduardo,
On 08/28/2014 11:53 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Dear Eduardo,
This patch is
Dear Eduardo,
On 08/28/2014 11:53 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Dear Eduardo,
>>
>> This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
>>
>> Please ignore only this patch because
>> the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Eduardo,
>
> This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
>
> Please ignore only this patch because
> the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
Do patches 1 - 3 are still correct? Patch 1, from Barlomiej, seams
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Dear Eduardo,
This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
Please ignore only this patch because
the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
Do patches 1 - 3 are still correct? Patch 1, from Barlomiej, seams to be
Dear Eduardo,
On 08/28/2014 11:53 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Dear Eduardo,
This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
Please ignore only this patch because
the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
Do
Dear Eduardo,
This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
Please ignore only this patch because
the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
On 08/26/2014 10:31 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch remove simply duplicate code when reading triminfo
Dear Eduardo,
This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
Please ignore only this patch because
the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
On 08/26/2014 10:31 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
This patch remove simply duplicate code when reading triminfo
This patch remove simply duplicate code when reading triminfo register of
Exynos5440.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
Cc: Zhang Rui
Cc: Eduardo Valentin
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap
Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 4 +---
1 file
This patch remove simply duplicate code when reading triminfo register of
Exynos5440.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi cw00.c...@samsung.com
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Cc: Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com
Cc: Eduardo Valentin edubez...@gmail.com
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap
12 matches
Mail list logo
