Re: [POWERPC] bootwrapper: One check less in fsl_get_immr() after error detection

On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 23:10 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:01:32 +0100 > > A status check was performed by the fsl_get_immr() function even if it > was known already that a system setting did not fit to the expectations. > > This

[POWERPC] bootwrapper: One check less in fsl_get_immr() after error detection

From: Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:01:32 +0100 A status check was performed by the fsl_get_immr() function even if it was known already that a system setting did not fit to the expectations. This implementation detail could be improved by an adjustment for a jump label according to

[POWERPC] bootwrapper: One check less in fsl_get_immr() after error detection

From: Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:01:32 +0100 A status check was performed by the fsl_get_immr() function even if it was known already that a system setting did not fit to the expectations. This implementation detail could be improved by an adjustment

Re: [POWERPC] bootwrapper: One check less in fsl_get_immr() after error detection

On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 23:10 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:01:32 +0100 > > A status check was performed by the fsl_get_immr() function even if it > was known already that a system setting did not fit to the