On Thu 25-05-17 21:43:43, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:27:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I guess it is worth reporting this to clang bugzilla. Could you take
> > care of that Nick?
>
> >From https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=33065#c5
> it seems that this is indeed
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:27:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I guess it is worth reporting this to clang bugzilla. Could you take
> care of that Nick?
>From https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=33065#c5
it seems that this is indeed a sequence bug in the previous version of
this code and not a
> I guess it is worth reporting this to clang bugzilla. Could you take
> care of that Nick?
Done: https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=33065
I have discussed this with our gcc guys and here is what they say:
On Wed 10-05-17 10:38:44, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> But I
> still do not understand which part of the code is undefined and why. My
> reading and understanding of the C specification is that
> struct A {
> int a;
> in
On Wed 10-05-17 01:27:34, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Clang flags this file with the -Wunsequenced error that GCC does not
> have.
>
> unsequenced modification and access to 'gfp_mask'
>
> It seems that gfp_mask is both read and written without a sequence point
> in between, which is undefined beha
Clang flags this file with the -Wunsequenced error that GCC does not
have.
unsequenced modification and access to 'gfp_mask'
It seems that gfp_mask is both read and written without a sequence point
in between, which is undefined behavior.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
---
Changes in v2:
- don
6 matches
Mail list logo
