Re: [Patch v2 3/3] s390/kprobes: add support for pc-relative long displacement instructions

2013-08-25 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
(2013/08/23 20:04), Heiko Carstens wrote: > With the general-instruction extension facility (z10) a couple of > instructions with a pc-relative long displacement were introduced. > The kprobes support for these instructions however was never implemented. > > In result, if anybody ever put a probe

Re: [Patch v2 3/3] s390/kprobes: add support for pc-relative long displacement instructions

2013-08-25 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
(2013/08/23 20:04), Heiko Carstens wrote: With the general-instruction extension facility (z10) a couple of instructions with a pc-relative long displacement were introduced. The kprobes support for these instructions however was never implemented. In result, if anybody ever put a probe on

[Patch v2 3/3] s390/kprobes: add support for pc-relative long displacement instructions

2013-08-23 Thread Heiko Carstens
With the general-instruction extension facility (z10) a couple of instructions with a pc-relative long displacement were introduced. The kprobes support for these instructions however was never implemented. In result, if anybody ever put a probe on any of these instructions the result would have

[Patch v2 3/3] s390/kprobes: add support for pc-relative long displacement instructions

2013-08-23 Thread Heiko Carstens
With the general-instruction extension facility (z10) a couple of instructions with a pc-relative long displacement were introduced. The kprobes support for these instructions however was never implemented. In result, if anybody ever put a probe on any of these instructions the result would have