On Fr, 2005-02-18 at 00:10 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 23:29:24 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
>> On Mi, 2005-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
>>
>> >The vmscan-dont-reclaim-too-many-pages.patch led to the said reduction
>> >of writing speed. I reverse-applied it to 2.6.8.1,
On Fr, 2005-02-18 at 00:10 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 23:29:24 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
On Mi, 2005-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
The vmscan-dont-reclaim-too-many-pages.patch led to the said reduction
of writing speed. I reverse-applied it to 2.6.8.1, where it
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 23:29:24 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
> On Mi, 2005-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
> >Some new information:
> >
> >2.6.7 is ok, 2.6.7-mm2 is not ok, 2.6.7 with just the linus-patch from
> >mm2 is ok, 2.6.7 with linus.patch from mm3 isn't.
> >So I took some of the patches
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 23:29:24 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
On Mi, 2005-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
Some new information:
2.6.7 is ok, 2.6.7-mm2 is not ok, 2.6.7 with just the linus-patch from
mm2 is ok, 2.6.7 with linus.patch from mm3 isn't.
So I took some of the patches from the
On Mi, 2005-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
>Some new information:
>
>2.6.7 is ok, 2.6.7-mm2 is not ok, 2.6.7 with just the linus-patch from
>mm2 is ok, 2.6.7 with linus.patch from mm3 isn't.
>So I took some of the patches from the broken-out mm2 and tested them
>seperately.
>
>The
Some new information:
2.6.7 is ok, 2.6.7-mm2 is not ok, 2.6.7 with just the linus-patch from
mm2 is ok, 2.6.7 with linus.patch from mm3 isn't.
So I took some of the patches from the broken-out mm2 and tested them
seperately.
The vmscan-dont-reclaim-too-many-pages.patch led to the said reduction
Some new information:
2.6.7 is ok, 2.6.7-mm2 is not ok, 2.6.7 with just the linus-patch from
mm2 is ok, 2.6.7 with linus.patch from mm3 isn't.
So I took some of the patches from the broken-out mm2 and tested them
seperately.
The vmscan-dont-reclaim-too-many-pages.patch led to the said reduction
On Mi, 2005-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
Some new information:
2.6.7 is ok, 2.6.7-mm2 is not ok, 2.6.7 with just the linus-patch from
mm2 is ok, 2.6.7 with linus.patch from mm3 isn't.
So I took some of the patches from the broken-out mm2 and tested them
seperately.
The
On Mo, 2005-02-14 at 11:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:25:34 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
>> Which 2.6.7 did you use?
>
>Only 2.6.7 with a -mm patch, since vanilla 2.6.7 screwed up my system
>clock, and the noapic option which was suggested to unscrew the clock
>screwed up the
On Mo, 2005-02-14 at 09:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
>I also have low write performance (around 300 kb/s) with several 2.6
>kernels (2.6.7 to 2.6.9-mm1) and I can hear the head jump around when I
>use ext2 or UDF. It will be fast when written directly to the device
>without a file system using dd.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:26:35 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> Droebbel wrote:
> > On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be
> > expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic
> > verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8
> >
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:26:35 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
Droebbel wrote:
On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be
expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic
verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8
to 2.6.10
On Mo, 2005-02-14 at 09:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
I also have low write performance (around 300 kb/s) with several 2.6
kernels (2.6.7 to 2.6.9-mm1) and I can hear the head jump around when I
use ext2 or UDF. It will be fast when written directly to the device
without a file system using dd.
On Mo, 2005-02-14 at 11:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:25:34 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
Which 2.6.7 did you use?
Only 2.6.7 with a -mm patch, since vanilla 2.6.7 screwed up my system
clock, and the noapic option which was suggested to unscrew the clock
screwed up the USB
Droebbel wrote:
> On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be
> expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic
> verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8
> to 2.6.10 write speed is as low as 600 to 1000 kB/s. The drive's head
>
On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be
expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic
verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8
to 2.6.10 write speed is as low as 600 to 1000 kB/s. The drive's head
jumps a lot more with
On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be
expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic
verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8
to 2.6.10 write speed is as low as 600 to 1000 kB/s. The drive's head
jumps a lot more with
Droebbel wrote:
On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be
expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic
verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8
to 2.6.10 write speed is as low as 600 to 1000 kB/s. The drive's head
18 matches
Mail list logo
