> > Would you use MD at all, taking in account the disks come from the
> > same batch and all? I hear these things about MD/RAID being pointless
> > when you use disks from the same brand/type/batch since they most
> > likely will break shortly after each other.
>
> Well, for values of "shortly"
Would you use MD at all, taking in account the disks come from the
same batch and all? I hear these things about MD/RAID being pointless
when you use disks from the same brand/type/batch since they most
likely will break shortly after each other.
Well, for values of shortly in months in
Patrick Ale wrote:
On 2/24/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more question regarding this, I am aware its not *really* kernel
related but answering this question now will save yourself a lot of
bogus emails from me about
Patrick Ale wrote:
On 2/24/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more question regarding this, I am aware its not *really* kernel
related but answering this question now will save yourself a lot of
bogus emails from me about MD
On Monday February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2/24/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One more question regarding this, I am aware its not *really* kernel
> related but answering this question now will save yourself
On 2/24/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more question regarding this, I am aware its not *really* kernel
related but answering this question now will save yourself a lot of
bogus emails from me about MD oopses later and
On 2/24/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more question regarding this, I am aware its not *really* kernel
related but answering this question now will save yourself a lot of
bogus emails from me about MD oopses later and all,
On Monday February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/24/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more question regarding this, I am aware its not *really* kernel
related but answering this question now will save yourself a lot of
On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But using 'fakeraid' (i.e. BIOS RAID) together with dmraid is
generally discouraged in favour of using the more stable and well
supported Linux Software RAID functionality.
Michael-Luke
I think I actually used dmraid, and the problem I
But using 'fakeraid' (i.e. BIOS RAID) together with dmraid is
generally discouraged in favour of using the more stable and well
supported Linux Software RAID functionality.
Michael-Luke
On 24 Feb 2007, at 15:24, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
use device mapper and dmraid
use device mapper and dmraid
http://people.redhat.com/~heinzm/sw/dmraid/
and please read
http://linux-ata.org/faq-sata-raid.html
On Saturday 24 February 2007, Patrick Ale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick question,
>
> Since I am going to open my server today to do some pata tests (for
Hi,
Quick question,
Since I am going to open my server today to do some pata tests (for
the weird detection problems people are giving me fantastic help with,
no sarcasm, I really mean it) I thought: why not add two 320GB SATA
disks on the SATA controller that the mainboard has.
I am
Hi,
Quick question,
Since I am going to open my server today to do some pata tests (for
the weird detection problems people are giving me fantastic help with,
no sarcasm, I really mean it) I thought: why not add two 320GB SATA
disks on the SATA controller that the mainboard has.
I am
use device mapper and dmraid
http://people.redhat.com/~heinzm/sw/dmraid/
and please read
http://linux-ata.org/faq-sata-raid.html
On Saturday 24 February 2007, Patrick Ale wrote:
Hi,
Quick question,
Since I am going to open my server today to do some pata tests (for
the
But using 'fakeraid' (i.e. BIOS RAID) together with dmraid is
generally discouraged in favour of using the more stable and well
supported Linux Software RAID functionality.
Michael-Luke
On 24 Feb 2007, at 15:24, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
use device mapper and dmraid
On 2/24/07, Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But using 'fakeraid' (i.e. BIOS RAID) together with dmraid is
generally discouraged in favour of using the more stable and well
supported Linux Software RAID functionality.
Michael-Luke
I think I actually used dmraid, and the problem I
16 matches
Mail list logo
