Hi Viresh,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30 August 2013 12:18, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> Hi Viresh,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
>>> wanted to know if the below mentioned
Hi Viresh,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 30 August 2013 12:18, Magnus Damm magnus.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Viresh,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote:
Hi,
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 15:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
This is always UP.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 30 August 2013 12:18, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
>> wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
>> clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same
Hi Viresh,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
> wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
> clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
>
> So, that we can use some generic routines for
Hi Viresh,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
So, that we can use some
On 30 August 2013 12:18, Magnus Damm magnus.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Viresh,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
clock domains for their
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 15:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
This is always UP.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Cris are also UP
29 aug 2013 kl. 12:16 skrev "Viresh Kumar" :
> Hi,
>
> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
> wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
> clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
>
> So, that we can use some generic routines for
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:45:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
> wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
> clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
[...]
> drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
Loongson2 is
On Thursday 29 August 2013 04:00 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 29 August 2013 15:53, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On DaVinci (DA850), there is an async domain available to keep some
>> peripheral clocks insulated from cpu frequency changes. But there are a
>> bunch of other clocks which do get affected
On 29 August 2013 15:57, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> I get it now. All DaVinci devices are UP only.
Thanks..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 29 August 2013 15:53, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On DaVinci (DA850), there is an async domain available to keep some
> peripheral clocks insulated from cpu frequency changes. But there are a
> bunch of other clocks which do get affected by CPU frequency change
> (they need to run at a fixed ratio to
On Thursday 29 August 2013 03:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
> wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
> clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
On DaVinci (DA850), there is an async domain available to
Hi,
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
So, that we can use some generic routines for these drivers which
would eventually do:
cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
And I
Hi,
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
So, that we can use some generic routines for these drivers which
would eventually do:
cpumask_setall(policy-cpus);
And I
On Thursday 29 August 2013 03:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
On DaVinci (DA850), there is an async domain available to keep
On 29 August 2013 15:53, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
On DaVinci (DA850), there is an async domain available to keep some
peripheral clocks insulated from cpu frequency changes. But there are a
bunch of other clocks which do get affected by CPU frequency change
(they need to run at a
On 29 August 2013 15:57, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
I get it now. All DaVinci devices are UP only.
Thanks..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Thursday 29 August 2013 04:00 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 29 August 2013 15:53, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
On DaVinci (DA850), there is an async domain available to keep some
peripheral clocks insulated from cpu frequency changes. But there are a
bunch of other clocks which do get
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:45:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
[...]
drivers/cpufreq/loongson2_cpufreq.c
Loongson2 is UP
Cris are also UP
29 aug 2013 kl. 12:16 skrev Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org:
Hi,
I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
So, that we can use some generic
22 matches
Mail list logo
