On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Adrian Bunk a ??crit :
> >On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>Adrian Bunk a ??crit :
> >>...
> >>>And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your
> >>>patch doesn't seem to make
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> I am using gcc-4.2.1
>
> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y makes no difference for me.
>
> $ make defconfig
> $ egrep "OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE|CONFIG_SMP" .config
> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y
> CONFIG_SMP=y
> $ make vmlinux
> $ nm -v
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
...
And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your
patch doesn't seem to make any space difference - are you using an older
compiler or even worse
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>...
>> And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your
>> patch doesn't seem to make any space difference - are you using an older
>> compiler or even worse
Matt Mackall a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
>
> c0581300 D random_table
> c0581480 d input_pool
> c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
> c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
> c0581600 d blocking_pool
>
> That means that
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
>>>
>>> c0581300 D random_table
>>> c0581480 d input_pool
>>> c0581580 d
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
>
> c0581300 D random_table
> c0581480 d input_pool
> c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
> c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
> c0581600 d blocking_pool
>
> That means that
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That means that the two integers random_read_wakeup_thresh and
random_write_wakeup_thresh use
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a ??crit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a ??crit :
...
And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your
patch doesn't seem to make any space
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That means that the two integers random_read_wakeup_thresh and
random_write_wakeup_thresh use
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That means that the two
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That means that the two
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d
Matt Mackall a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
While examining vmlinux namelist on i686, I noticed :
c0581300 D random_table
c0581480 d input_pool
c0581580 d random_read_wakeup_thresh
c0581584 d random_write_wakeup_thresh
c0581600 d blocking_pool
That
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
...
And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your
patch doesn't seem to make any space difference - are you using an older
compiler or even worse CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n for
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
...
And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your
patch doesn't seem to make any space difference - are you using an older
compiler or even worse
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
I am using gcc-4.2.1
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y makes no difference for me.
$ make defconfig
$ egrep OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE|CONFIG_SMP .config
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y
CONFIG_SMP=y
$ make vmlinux
$ nm -v vmlinux|grep -4
22 matches
Mail list logo