Re: [REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-27 Thread Bill Davidsen
Con Kolivas wrote: On Friday 27 April 2007 08:00, Bill Davidsen wrote: Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: SD 0.46 1-2 FPS cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 cfs v5 nice -10 60-65 FPS the problem is,

Re: [REPORT] First glitch1 results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-27 Thread Bill Davidsen
Con Kolivas wrote: On Friday 27 April 2007 08:00, Bill Davidsen wrote: Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SD 0.46 1-2 FPS cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 cfs v5 nice -10 60-65 FPS the problem is,

Re: [REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-26 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Thursday 26 April 2007 18:56, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Friday 27 April 2007 08:00, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> SD 0.46 1-2 FPS > > >>> cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS > > >>> cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 > > >> > > >>

Re: [REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-26 Thread Con Kolivas
On Friday 27 April 2007 08:00, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> SD 0.46 1-2 FPS > >>> cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS > >>> cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 > >> > >>cfs v5 nice -10 60-65 FPS > > > > the problem is, the glxgears

Re: [REPORT] First glitch1 results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-26 Thread Con Kolivas
On Friday 27 April 2007 08:00, Bill Davidsen wrote: Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SD 0.46 1-2 FPS cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 cfs v5 nice -10 60-65 FPS the problem is, the glxgears portion of this test is an

Re: [REPORT] First glitch1 results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-26 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Thursday 26 April 2007 18:56, Con Kolivas wrote: On Friday 27 April 2007 08:00, Bill Davidsen wrote: Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SD 0.46 1-2 FPS cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 cfs v5 nice -10 60-65 FPS

Re: [REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-24 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > SD 0.46 1-2 FPS > > cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS > > cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 >cfs v5 nice -10 60-65 FPS the problem is, the glxgears portion of this test is an _inverse_ testcase. The reason? glxgears on true 3D hardware

Re: [REPORT] First glitch1 results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-24 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SD 0.46 1-2 FPS cfs v5 nice -19 219-233 FPS cfs v5 nice 0 1000-1996 cfs v5 nice -10 60-65 FPS the problem is, the glxgears portion of this test is an _inverse_ testcase. The reason? glxgears on true 3D hardware will

Re: [REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-23 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 23 April 2007 19:45, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On Monday 23 April 2007 17:57, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > I am not sure a binary attachment will go thru, I will move to the web > > ste if not. > > I did a quick try of this script here. > > With SD 0.46 with X at nice 0 I was getting 1-2

Re: [REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-23 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 23 April 2007 17:57, Bill Davidsen wrote: > I am not sure a binary attachment will go thru, I will move to the web > ste if not. I did a quick try of this script here. With SD 0.46 with X at nice 0 I was getting 1-2 frames per second. I decided to try cfs v5. The option disable auto

[REPORT] First "glitch1" results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5

2007-04-23 Thread Bill Davidsen
I am not sure a binary attachment will go thru, I will move to the web ste if not. GL2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5_nice0_jump Description: Binary data GL2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5_nice0_nojump Description: Binary data GL2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5_nice19_nojump Description: Binary data

[REPORT] First glitch1 results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5

2007-04-23 Thread Bill Davidsen
I am not sure a binary attachment will go thru, I will move to the web ste if not. GL2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5_nice0_jump Description: Binary data GL2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5_nice0_nojump Description: Binary data GL2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5_nice19_nojump Description: Binary data

Re: [REPORT] First glitch1 results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-23 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 23 April 2007 17:57, Bill Davidsen wrote: I am not sure a binary attachment will go thru, I will move to the web ste if not. I did a quick try of this script here. With SD 0.46 with X at nice 0 I was getting 1-2 frames per second. I decided to try cfs v5. The option disable auto

Re: [REPORT] First glitch1 results, 2.6.21-rc7-git6-CFSv5 + SD 0.46

2007-04-23 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 23 April 2007 19:45, Ed Tomlinson wrote: On Monday 23 April 2007 17:57, Bill Davidsen wrote: I am not sure a binary attachment will go thru, I will move to the web ste if not. I did a quick try of this script here. With SD 0.46 with X at nice 0 I was getting 1-2 frames per