On 08/01/2012 02:39 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> blk_set_stacking_limits is intended to allow stacking drivers to build
> up the limits of the stacked device based on the underlying devices'
> limits. But defaulting 'max_sectors' to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1024)
> doesn't allow the stacking driver to
On 08/01/2012 02:39 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
blk_set_stacking_limits is intended to allow stacking drivers to build
up the limits of the stacked device based on the underlying devices'
limits. But defaulting 'max_sectors' to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1024)
doesn't allow the stacking driver to
blk_set_stacking_limits is intended to allow stacking drivers to build
up the limits of the stacked device based on the underlying devices'
limits. But defaulting 'max_sectors' to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1024)
doesn't allow the stacking driver to inherit a max_sectors larger than
1024 -- due to
blk_set_stacking_limits is intended to allow stacking drivers to build
up the limits of the stacked device based on the underlying devices'
limits. But defaulting 'max_sectors' to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1024)
doesn't allow the stacking driver to inherit a max_sectors larger than
1024 -- due to
4 matches
Mail list logo
