Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:21:16 + (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > That is not the question. We don't care about how many times module.h is > included in the kernel, but rather what module.h itself includes and could > include in the future, throughout generic and arch-specific headers. If >

Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
even Rostedt" > > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Andrew Morton" > > > , "Peter Zijlstra" > > > , "Frederic Weisbecker" , > > > "Mathieu Desnoyers" > > > > > > Sent:

Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
gt; > , "Frederic Weisbecker" , > > "Mathieu Desnoyers" > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:01:40 PM > > Subject: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint > > code > > > > [ Request for Acks ] &

Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- Original Message - > From: "Steven Rostedt" > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Andrew Morton" > , "Peter Zijlstra" > , "Frederic Weisbecker" , "Mathieu > Desnoyers" > > Sent:

[RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
[ Request for Acks ] Due to module tainting, we have tracepoints that silently do not work. That will be solved another way. But the trace event infrastructure should not be created for tainted modules. That is, the debugfs files should not exist for them. By moving the tracepoint module taint

[RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
[ Request for Acks ] Due to module tainting, we have tracepoints that silently do not work. That will be solved another way. But the trace event infrastructure should not be created for tainted modules. That is, the debugfs files should not exist for them. By moving the tracepoint module taint

Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
...@efficios.com Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:01:40 PM Subject: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code [ Request for Acks ] Due to module tainting, we have tracepoints that silently do not work. That will be solved another way. But the trace event

Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:01:40 PM Subject: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code [ Request for Acks ] Due to module

Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:38:53 PM Subject: Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:36:18 + (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Steven

Re: [RFA][PATCH 0/4] tracing: Request for acks on fixing tracepoint code

2014-02-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:21:16 + (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote: That is not the question. We don't care about how many times module.h is included in the kernel, but rather what module.h itself includes and could include in the future, throughout generic and