On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Bityutskiy, Artem
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 16:42 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:01 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> > At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
>> > there are PEB's pending to be erased.
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 16:42 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:01 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> > At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
> > there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
> > the pool from which
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:01 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
> there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
> the pool from which user required PEBs are allocated) will be empty.
> Try fixing the
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:01 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
the pool from which user required PEBs are allocated) will be empty.
Try fixing the above
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 16:42 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:01 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
the pool from which user
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Bityutskiy, Artem
artem.bityuts...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 16:42 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:01 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's
Am 07.04.2014 18:05, schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
> On 4/7/2014 4:02 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tanya Brokhman
>> wrote:
>>> At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
>>> there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario,
On 4/7/2014 4:02 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
the pool from which user required PEBs are
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
> there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
> the pool from which user required PEBs are allocated) will be empty.
> Try fixing the above
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tanya Brokhman tlin...@codeaurora.org wrote:
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
the pool from which user required PEBs are allocated) will be empty.
On 4/7/2014 4:02 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tanya Brokhman tlin...@codeaurora.org wrote:
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
the pool from which user
Am 07.04.2014 18:05, schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
On 4/7/2014 4:02 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tanya Brokhman tlin...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such
: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 11:02 AM
To: dedeki...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-...@lists.infradead.org; open list; Tanya Brokhman
Subject: [RFC/PATCH] mtd: ubi: Free peb's synchronously for fastmap
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since there
are PEB's pending to be erased
Of
Tanya Brokhman
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 11:02 AM
To: dedeki...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-...@lists.infradead.org; open list; Tanya Brokhman
Subject: [RFC/PATCH] mtd: ubi: Free peb's synchronously for fastmap
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since there
are PEB's
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
the pool from which user required PEBs are allocated) will be empty.
Try fixing the above described situation by synchronously performing
pending erase
At first mount it's possible that there are not enough free PEBs since
there are PEB's pending to be erased. In such scenario, fm_pool (which is
the pool from which user required PEBs are allocated) will be empty.
Try fixing the above described situation by synchronously performing
pending erase
16 matches
Mail list logo
