On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
> ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
> examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
> change, as
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
change, as we
Em Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:08:30AM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:24:22PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
> > > ranges.
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:20:08AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:08:30AM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:24:22PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > >
Em Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:08:30AM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:24:22PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges.
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:20:08AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:08:30AM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:24:22PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Make it
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:24:22PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
> > ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
> > examples
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 05:24:22PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
examples show
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:57:50PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
SNIP
> >
> > ISTR discussing this with Jiri at some point.. I think we ended up with
> > being fine with overlapping ranges but having perf issue a warning (not
> > an error) when attributes of a single event have overlap.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:21 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
> > ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
> > examples show
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:21 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
> ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
> examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
> change, as we are
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
> ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
> examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
> change, as
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
change, as we
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:21 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
change, as we are
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:21 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
examples show
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:57:50PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
SNIP
ISTR discussing this with Jiri at some point.. I think we ended up with
being fine with overlapping ranges but having perf issue a warning (not
an error) when attributes of a single event have overlap.
OK great.
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
change, as we are defining something that was previously undefined, but
others may
Make it explicit that the format attributes may define overlapping bit
ranges. Unfortunately this was left unspecified originally, and all the
examples show non-overlapping ranges. I don't believe this is an ABI
change, as we are defining something that was previously undefined, but
others may
18 matches
Mail list logo
