Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-04-01 Thread Tom Duffy
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 14:03 -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote: > Does this patch help? YES! I can now power down the slot, see it gone from pci list, reenable it, etc. Awesome. Thank you. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lspci -s 08:00 08:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 105f (rev 03) 08:00.1

Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-31 Thread Rajesh Shah
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:03:16PM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote: > > I have updated to Wilcox's rewrite, Rajesh's stuff, and Dely's latest > patch. Still seeing these: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# modprobe acpiphp > acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.5 > acpiphp: Slot [4] registered

Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-31 Thread Len Brown
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:27, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:04:57AM -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote: > > > - Are you wanting the acpi specific patches to go into the > tree > > > through the acpi developers? How about the ia64 specific > > > patches? > > > > I honestly don't

Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-23 Thread Tom Duffy
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 19:13 -0800, Dely Sy wrote: > I just did a test of Rajesh's latest patch on 2.6.11.5 with > Wilcox's acpiphp rewrite and the following patch. Hot-plug of > PCI Express card worked fine on my i386 system I have updated to Wilcox's rewrite, Rajesh's stuff, and Dely's latest p

RE: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-22 Thread Dely Sy
On Monday, March 21, 2005 5:07 PM, Dely Sy wrote: > On Monday, March 21, 2005 10:05 AM, Rajesh Shah wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:13:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > - Does this break the i386 acpiphp functionality? > > Dely Sy had tested hotplug with an earlier version of my patches > >

RE: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-21 Thread Sy, Dely L
On Monday, March 21, 2005 10:05 AM, Rajesh Shah wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:13:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > - Does this break the i386 acpiphp functionality? > Dely Sy had tested hotplug with an earlier version of my patches > (with minor differences from the current series) on i386

Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-21 Thread Rajesh Shah
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:34:07PM -0800, Paul Ionescu wrote: > > --- Rajesh Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge is > > hot-added, not a PCI to PCI bridge (which is what the docking > > station is). The code to support p2p bridge hotp

Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-21 Thread Paul Ionescu
Hi Rajesh, --- Rajesh Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Paul Ionescu wrote: > > > > Does this mean that when it will be ported for i386, I will be able to > > really use my Docking Station ? > > No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge i

Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-21 Thread Rajesh Shah
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Paul Ionescu wrote: > > Does this mean that when it will be ported for i386, I will be able to > really use my Docking Station ? No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge is hot-added, not a PCI to PCI bridge (which is what the docking st

Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-21 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:04:57AM -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote: > > - Are you wanting the acpi specific patches to go into the tree > > through the acpi developers? How about the ia64 specific > > patches? > > I honestly don't know what the best approach is here - what do you > recom

Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-21 Thread Rajesh Shah
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:13:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > This all looks very good, nice job. I only had one minor comment on the > patches, which I'll reply to directly. > > But I did have a few questions: > - This series relys on Mathew's rewrite of the acpiphp driver. > Is th

Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-19 Thread Paul Ionescu
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:38:57 -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote: > Here is a series of patches to support ACPI hot-add of a root bridge > hierarchy. The added hierarchy may contain other p2p bridges and end/leaf > I/O devices too. The root bridge itself is assumed to have been assigned > resource ranges, bu

Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:38:57PM -0800, Rajesh Shah wrote: > Here is a series of patches to support ACPI hot-add of a root > bridge hierarchy. The added hierarchy may contain other p2p > bridges and end/leaf I/O devices too. The root bridge itself is > assumed to have been assigned resource rang

[RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add

2005-03-18 Thread Rajesh Shah
Here is a series of patches to support ACPI hot-add of a root bridge hierarchy. The added hierarchy may contain other p2p bridges and end/leaf I/O devices too. The root bridge itself is assumed to have been assigned resource ranges, but the p2p bridges and end devices are not required to be initia