On 2/15/21 6:31 PM, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi John,
We could test this patch and it works fine. Regarding the usage of
request->tag, We have some challenges there.
Pm80xx driver need tag for internal command as well. Tag is controller wide and
we need to assign unique tag
for internal
2327 ; ra...@google.com;
bjashn...@google.com; vishakh...@google.com;
jinpu.w...@cloud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; h...@suse.de;
kashyap.de...@broadcom.com; ming@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues f
.de;
> kashyap.de...@broadcom.com; ming....@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
> hw
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 01/02/2021 17:08, viswa...@microchip.com w
m; ming....@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
> hw
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 01/02/2021 17:08, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
> > Hi John,
>
.de...@broadcom.com; ming@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
hw
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
content is safe
On 31/01/2021 07:19, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
Thanks Johns.
We could see a kernel crash wh
om; ming....@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
> hw
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 31/01/2021 07:19, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
> > Thanks Johns.
.@google.com;
jinpu.w...@cloud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; h...@suse.de;
kashyap.de...@broadcom.com; ming....@redhat.com; John Garry
Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx hw
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click l
use.de;
> kashyap.de...@broadcom.com; ming@redhat.com; John Garry
>
> Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx hw
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> In commit 05c6c029a44d (&qu
On 11/01/2021 11:57, Jinpu Wang wrote:
Hi John,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:21 PM John Garry wrote:
In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple HW
queues.
In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW
Hi John,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:21 PM John Garry wrote:
>
> In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
> queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple HW
> queues.
>
> In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW queues were not exposed
> to
In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple HW
queues.
In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW queues were not exposed
to upper layer, and instead the driver managed the queues internally.
However,
11 matches
Mail list logo
