Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > #define PAGE_FLAGS_PRIVATE \
> > (1UL << PG_private | 1UL << PG_private_2)
>
> I think this should be re-named to be PAGE_FLAGS_CLEANUP, because I
> don't think it makes any other sense to "combine" the two PG_private*
> bits any more
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:15 PM David Howells wrote:
>
> mm: Split page_has_private() in two to better handle PG_private_2
>From a look through the patch and some (limited) thinking about it, I
like the patch. I think it clarifies the two very different cases, and
makes it clear that one is about
Hi Willy, Linus,
How about this to handle the situation with PG_private_2? I think it handles
things according to Linus's suggestion.
David
---
mm: Split page_has_private() in two to better handle PG_private_2
Split page_has_private() into two functions:
(1) page_needs_cleanup() to find out i
3 matches
Mail list logo