On 7/25/2018 6:18 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 08:48 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/24/2018 10:39 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>> (1)
On 7/25/2018 6:18 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 08:48 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/24/2018 10:39 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>> (1)
On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 08:48 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/24/2018 10:39 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > > On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > > > Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > (1) Mount topology and
On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 08:48 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/24/2018 10:39 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > > On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > > > Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > (1) Mount topology and
On 7/24/2018 10:39 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
>>> Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>>
> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're
On 7/24/2018 10:39 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
>>> Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>>
> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >
> > > > (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
> > >
> > > With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
> > > address
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >
> > > > (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
> > >
> > > With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
> > > address
Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >>> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
> >> With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
> >> address access control on events. If root in a user namespace mounts a
> >> filesystem you may have a case where the "real" user
Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >>> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
> >> With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
> >> address access control on events. If root in a user namespace mounts a
> >> filesystem you may have a case where the "real" user
On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
>> With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
>> address access control on events. If root in a user namespace mounts a
>> filesystem you
On 7/24/2018 9:00 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
>> With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
>> address access control on events. If root in a user namespace mounts a
>> filesystem you
Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
>
> With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
> address access control on events. If root in a user namespace mounts a
> filesystem you may have a case where the "real" user wouldn't
Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
>
> With the possibility of unprivileged mounting you're going to have to
> address access control on events. If root in a user namespace mounts a
> filesystem you may have a case where the "real" user wouldn't
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 09:31 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/23/2018 8:25 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > Here's a set of patches to add a general variable-length notification queue
> > concept and to add sources of events for:
>
> Overall I approve. The interface is a bit
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 09:31 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/23/2018 8:25 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > Here's a set of patches to add a general variable-length notification queue
> > concept and to add sources of events for:
>
> Overall I approve. The interface is a bit
On 7/23/2018 8:25 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> Here's a set of patches to add a general variable-length notification queue
> concept and to add sources of events for:
Overall I approve. The interface is a bit clunky. Some concerns below.
>
> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration
On 7/23/2018 8:25 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> Here's a set of patches to add a general variable-length notification queue
> concept and to add sources of events for:
Overall I approve. The interface is a bit clunky. Some concerns below.
>
> (1) Mount topology and reconfiguration
Hi Al,
Here's a set of patches to add a general variable-length notification queue
concept and to add sources of events for:
(1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
(2) Superblocks EIO, ENOSPC and EDQUOT events (not complete yet).
(3) Key/keyring changes events
One of the
Hi Al,
Here's a set of patches to add a general variable-length notification queue
concept and to add sources of events for:
(1) Mount topology and reconfiguration change events.
(2) Superblocks EIO, ENOSPC and EDQUOT events (not complete yet).
(3) Key/keyring changes events
One of the
20 matches
Mail list logo
