On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:48:06PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> Thus its been occasionally noted that users have seen
> confusing warnings like:
>
> Adjusting tsc more than 11% (5941981 vs 7759439)
> v2: Catch single unit adjustment that was being made
> repeatedly to push us past the
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:48:06PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> Thus its been occasionally noted that users have seen
> confusing warnings like:
>
> Adjusting tsc more than 11% (5941981 vs 7759439)
> v2: Catch single unit adjustment that was being made
> repeatedly to push us past the
Thus its been occasionally noted that users have seen
confusing warnings like:
Adjusting tsc more than 11% (5941981 vs 7759439)
We try to limit the maximum total adjustment to 11% (10% tick
adjustment + 0.5% frequency adjustment). But this is done by
bounding the requested adjustment values,
Thus its been occasionally noted that users have seen
confusing warnings like:
Adjusting tsc more than 11% (5941981 vs 7759439)
We try to limit the maximum total adjustment to 11% (10% tick
adjustment + 0.5% frequency adjustment). But this is done by
bounding the requested adjustment values,
4 matches
Mail list logo
