On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:00:06 -0400
a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote:
>> Likewise. You infact write that it does get the lock information
>> later in the document wrt. F_OFD_GETLK.
>
>Sorry, I disagree here...GETLK is really a misnomer, IMO. TESTLK
>would have been a better n
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> Likewise. You infact write that it does get the lock information
>> later in the document wrt. F_OFD_GETLK.
>
>Sorry, I disagree here...GETLK is really a misnomer, IMO. TESTLK
>would have been a better name.
I'm inclined
> Likewise. You infact write that it does get the lock information
> later in the document wrt. F_OFD_GETLK.
Sorry, I disagree here...GETLK is really a misnomer, IMO. TESTLK
would have been a better name.
GETLK are used is to "get the first lock".
It's a way to test whether a
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:09:51 -0400
a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote:
>@@ -2890,7 +2894,7 @@ Get flags associated with the open file. @xref{File
> Status Flags}.
> Set flags associated with the open file. @xref{File Status Flags}.
>
> @item F_GETLK
>-Get a file lock. @xref
@@ -2890,7 +2894,7 @@ Get flags associated with the open file. @xref{File
Status Flags}.
Set flags associated with the open file. @xref{File Status Flags}.
@item F_GETLK
-Get a file lock. @xref{File Locks}.
+Test a file lock. @xref{File Locks}.
F_GETLK does get the (first) l
Hi Jeff,
Comments below.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> (I haven't yet sent the patch to rename these to Linus, but here's a
> new draft version of the glibc header/manual updates for open file
> description locks. Please speak up if you see any issues or object
> to th
(I haven't yet sent the patch to rename these to Linus, but here's a
new draft version of the glibc header/manual updates for open file
description locks. Please speak up if you see any issues or object
to the new name.)
Open file description locks have been merged into the Linux kernel for
v3.
7 matches
Mail list logo