On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Tim Schmielau wrote:
> > The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
> > real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
> > parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
> >
> > I am not aware
Tim Schmielau wrote:
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
case. So
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
> > case.
>
> Normal process accounting.
Sure. That's what the patch was made for. Or do you have anything else
in mind than BSD
Tim Schmielau wrote:
I'm trying to reconstruct the complete history of processes from the
BSD accounting records. However, this is not very useful if a large
fraction of the processes look as if they were started by init.
The following program will print the history in a form vaguely resembling
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Tim Schmielau wrote:
>
> >
> >I'm trying to reconstruct the complete history of processes from the
> >BSD accounting records. However, this is not very useful if a large
> >fraction of the processes look as if they were started by init.
> >
> >The
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Helge Hafting wrote:
Tim Schmielau wrote:
I'm trying to reconstruct the complete history of processes from the
BSD accounting records. However, this is not very useful if a large
fraction of the processes look as if they were started by init.
The following program
Tim Schmielau wrote:
I'm trying to reconstruct the complete history of processes from the
BSD accounting records. However, this is not very useful if a large
fraction of the processes look as if they were started by init.
The following program will print the history in a form vaguely resembling
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
case.
Normal process accounting.
Sure. That's what the patch was made for. Or do you have anything else
in mind than BSD accounting?
Tim Schmielau wrote:
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
case. So
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Tim Schmielau wrote:
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
> case.
Normal process accounting.
If you want to keep the pid of the bio-parent, you also need to keep the
start-time to make it unique. Better would be to have a all-time-unqiue
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Quoting Tim Schmielau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
> > real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
> > parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
>
Quoting Tim Schmielau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
> real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
> parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
>
> I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Tim Schmielau wrote:
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
case. So I made up the
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
case. So I made up the
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Tim Schmielau wrote:
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that
Quoting Tim Schmielau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Michael Buesch wrote:
Quoting Tim Schmielau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The ppid of a process is not really helpful if I want to reconstruct the
real history of processes on a machine, since it may become 1 when the
parent dies and the process is reparented to init.
I am
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I am not aware of concepts in Linux or other unices that apply to this
case.
Normal process accounting.
If you want to keep the pid of the bio-parent, you also need to keep the
start-time to make it unique. Better would be to have a all-time-unqiue
20 matches
Mail list logo
