Re: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets

2013-05-31 Thread Alex Shi
On 05/31/2013 09:17 AM, Alex Shi wrote: >> > Kernel: 3.9 >> > >> > Patch sets: >> > rlb-v4: sched: use runnable load based balance (Alex Shi) >> > > Thanks for the valuable comparison! > > The runnable load balance target is performance. It is still

Re: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets

2013-05-31 Thread Alex Shi
On 05/31/2013 09:17 AM, Alex Shi wrote: Kernel: 3.9 Patch sets: rlb-v4: sched: use runnable load based balance (Alex Shi) https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/27/13 Thanks for the valuable comparison! The runnable load balance target is performance. It is still try to disperse

Re: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets

2013-05-30 Thread Alex Shi
On 05/30/2013 09:47 PM, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > Hi, > > A number of patch sets related to power-efficient scheduling have been > posted over the last couple of months. Most of them do not have much > data to back them up, so I decided to do some testing. > > Common for all of the patch sets

[RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets

2013-05-30 Thread Morten Rasmussen
Hi, A number of patch sets related to power-efficient scheduling have been posted over the last couple of months. Most of them do not have much data to back them up, so I decided to do some testing. Common for all of the patch sets that I have tested, except one, is that they attempt to pack

[RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets

2013-05-30 Thread Morten Rasmussen
Hi, A number of patch sets related to power-efficient scheduling have been posted over the last couple of months. Most of them do not have much data to back them up, so I decided to do some testing. Common for all of the patch sets that I have tested, except one, is that they attempt to pack

Re: [RFC] Comparison of power-efficient scheduling patch sets

2013-05-30 Thread Alex Shi
On 05/30/2013 09:47 PM, Morten Rasmussen wrote: Hi, A number of patch sets related to power-efficient scheduling have been posted over the last couple of months. Most of them do not have much data to back them up, so I decided to do some testing. Common for all of the patch sets that I