On Tuesday 24 April 2007 04:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation
> > glitches in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and
> > will have several more tomorrow. I'm off to a
* Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation
> glitches in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and
> will have several more tomorrow. I'm off to a poker game, and would
> like to let people draw their own
* Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation
glitches in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and
will have several more tomorrow. I'm off to a poker game, and would
like to let people draw their own conclusions.
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 04:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation
glitches in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and
will have several more tomorrow. I'm off to a poker game, and
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Based on just this script as load I would say renice on X isn't a good
> thing. Based on one small test, I would say that renice of X in
> conjunction with heavy disk i/o and a single fast scrolling xterm (think
> kernel compile) seems
The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation glitches
in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and will have
several more tomorrow. I'm off to a poker game, and would like to let
people draw their own conclusions.
Based on just this script as load I would say
The small attached script does a nice job of showing animation glitches
in the glxgears animation. I have run one set of tests, and will have
several more tomorrow. I'm off to a poker game, and would like to let
people draw their own conclusions.
Based on just this script as load I would say
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Based on just this script as load I would say renice on X isn't a good
thing. Based on one small test, I would say that renice of X in
conjunction with heavy disk i/o and a single fast scrolling xterm (think
kernel compile) seems to
8 matches
Mail list logo