Re: [RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-11 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 12:10 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 06/11/2013 02:13:45 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > > You could either have the same entry in more than one MAINTAINERS > > file > > > or keep it at a higher level. (This wouldn't

Re: [RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-11 Thread Rob Landley
On 06/11/2013 02:13:45 AM, Joe Perches wrote: On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > You could either have the same entry in more than one MAINTAINERS file > or keep it at a higher level. (This wouldn't eliminate the top level > MAINTAINERS, merely trim it down a bit.) > >

Re: [RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-11 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > Quite possibly the answer is "no", but the MAINTAINERS file is > approaching 10,000 lines. Getting a bit unwieldy. I think it hasn't been much of a bottleneck problem. > The question is: would this be an improvement? (And worth the

Re: [RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-11 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: Quite possibly the answer is no, but the MAINTAINERS file is approaching 10,000 lines. Getting a bit unwieldy. I think it hasn't been much of a bottleneck problem. The question is: would this be an improvement? (And worth the changes

Re: [RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-11 Thread Rob Landley
On 06/11/2013 02:13:45 AM, Joe Perches wrote: On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: You could either have the same entry in more than one MAINTAINERS file or keep it at a higher level. (This wouldn't eliminate the top level MAINTAINERS, merely trim it down a bit.) Just

Re: [RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-11 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 12:10 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: On 06/11/2013 02:13:45 AM, Joe Perches wrote: On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: You could either have the same entry in more than one MAINTAINERS file or keep it at a higher level. (This wouldn't eliminate the

[RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-10 Thread Rob Landley
Quite possibly the answer is "no", but the MAINTAINERS file is approaching 10,000 lines. Getting a bit unwieldy. Most of the entries look like: ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT M: Kyungmin Park L: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) S:

[RFC] is it time to split up the MAINTAINERS file?

2013-06-10 Thread Rob Landley
Quite possibly the answer is no, but the MAINTAINERS file is approaching 10,000 lines. Getting a bit unwieldy. Most of the entries look like: ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT M: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com L: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org (moderated for