Hi Neil,
On 01/07, NeilBrown wrote:
> > To do the same with up to six failures, it's now required some kind of sort
> > function.
>
> So I would probably just make sure we always process the block is the "right"
> order. Then sorting would be irrelevant.
> But as I say, I haven't fiddled with
Hi Neil,
On 01/07, NeilBrown wrote:
To do the same with up to six failures, it's now required some kind of sort
function.
So I would probably just make sure we always process the block is the right
order. Then sorting would be irrelevant.
But as I say, I haven't fiddled with the code,
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:45:23 +0100 Andrea Mazzoleni
wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. In the meantime I went further in developing and
> I've just sent version 2 of the patch, that contains a preliminary btrfs
> modification to use the new interface.
>
> Please use this one for
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:45:23 +0100 Andrea Mazzoleni amadva...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Neil,
Thanks for your feedback. In the meantime I went further in developing and
I've just sent version 2 of the patch, that contains a preliminary btrfs
modification to use the new interface.
Please use
4 matches
Mail list logo
