Veaceslav Falico writes:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>Tejun Heo writes:
>>
>>> Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
>
> Hi Tejun, Eric,
>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> >>This works like a charm. However, if I want
Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org writes:
Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
Hi Tejun, Eric,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
This works like a charm. However, if
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Tejun Heo writes:
Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
Hi Tejun, Eric,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> >>This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
>>> >>symlink
Hey, Eric.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
> index 3ae3f1bf1a09..651444a9d1c5 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
> @@ -194,12 +194,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysfs_remove_link);
> *
Tejun Heo writes:
> Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >>> >>This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
>> >>> >>symlink present):
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>sysfs_rename_link(&(a->dev.kobj), &(b->dev.kobj),
Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>> >>This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
> >>> >>symlink present):
> >>> >>
> >>> >>sysfs_rename_link(&(a->dev.kobj), &(b->dev.kobj), oldname, newname);
> >>> >
> >>>
Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
symlink present):
sysfs_rename_link((a-dev.kobj), (b-dev.kobj), oldname, newname);
You forgot the namespace option to this
Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org writes:
Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
symlink present):
sysfs_rename_link((a-dev.kobj), (b-dev.kobj), oldname, newname);
Hey, Eric.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
diff --git a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
index 3ae3f1bf1a09..651444a9d1c5 100644
--- a/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
+++ b/fs/sysfs/symlink.c
@@ -194,12 +194,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysfs_remove_link);
*
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org writes:
Hey, Veaceslav, Eric.
Hi Tejun, Eric,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:35:23PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
symlink
On 2014/1/15 1:17, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
>
> Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
> Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a->name/linkname to b, one should
> use:
>
>
Veaceslav Falico writes:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:31:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>>On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>>> >On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>>> >>Hi,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:31:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:31:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm hitting a strange issue and/or
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
> >>
>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
Now, to create a link
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
>
> Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
> Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a->name/linkname to b, one
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a->name/linkname to b, one should
use:
sysfs_create_link(&(a->dev.kobj), &(b->dev.kobj), linkname);
To
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a-name/linkname to b, one should
use:
sysfs_create_link((a-dev.kobj), (b-dev.kobj), linkname);
To
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a-name/linkname to b, one should
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
Now, to create a link
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:31:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:31:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100,
Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:31:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:21:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
Hi,
On 2014/1/15 1:17, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a-name/linkname to b, one should
use:
26 matches
Mail list logo