On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:58:32 -0400
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 17:51 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
> Thanks, a few comments below.
Thanks for comments!
> >
> > * Description of patch
> > This patch improves performance of read/write in SELinux.
> > It improves performance by
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 17:51 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Stephen Smalley pointed out possibility of race condition
> in off-list discussion.
> Stephen Smalley said:
> > One other observation about the patch: it presently leaves open a
> > (small) race window in which the file could
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 17:51 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
Hi.
Stephen Smalley pointed out possibility of race condition
in off-list discussion.
Stephen Smalley said:
One other observation about the patch: it presently leaves open a
(small) race window in which the file could get
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:58:32 -0400
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 17:51 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
snip
Thanks, a few comments below.
Thanks for comments!
* Description of patch
This patch improves performance of read/write in SELinux.
It improves performance by
Hi.
Stephen Smalley pointed out possibility of race condition
in off-list discussion.
Stephen Smalley said:
> One other observation about the patch: it presently leaves open a
> (small) race window in which the file could get relabeled or policy gets
> reloaded between the time of the normal
Hi.
Stephen Smalley pointed out possibility of race condition
in off-list discussion.
Stephen Smalley said:
One other observation about the patch: it presently leaves open a
(small) race window in which the file could get relabeled or policy gets
reloaded between the time of the normal
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:31 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
> Next is updated patch.
Thanks.
Please include the short description of the patch though when
re-submitting.
> Signed-off-by: Yuichi Nakamura<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> fs/open.c |5 +
>
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 10:31 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
Next is updated patch.
Thanks.
Please include the short description of the patch though when
re-submitting.
Signed-off-by: Yuichi Nakamura[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/open.c |5 +
include/linux/security.h
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:47:15 -0400
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> >
> > @@ -431,8 +432,10 @@ static int avc_latest_notif_update(int s
> > ret = -EAGAIN;
> > }
> > } else {
> > - if (seqno > avc_cache.latest_notif)
> > + if (seqno >
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:47:15 -0400
Stephen Smalley wrote:
snip
@@ -431,8 +432,10 @@ static int avc_latest_notif_update(int s
ret = -EAGAIN;
}
} else {
- if (seqno avc_cache.latest_notif)
+ if (seqno avc_cache.latest_notif)
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:27 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As I posted before in selinux list,
> I found big overhead of SELinux in read/write on some CPUs,
> and trying tuning.
> There were discussion in previous threads.
> Part 1:
> http://marc.info/?t=11884534341=1=2
> Part 2:
Hello.
As I posted before in selinux list,
I found big overhead of SELinux in read/write on some CPUs,
and trying tuning.
There were discussion in previous threads.
Part 1:
http://marc.info/?t=11884534341=1=2
Part 2:
http://marc.info/?t=11888074984=1=2
I would like to RFC again about
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:27 +0900, Yuichi Nakamura wrote:
Hello.
As I posted before in selinux list,
I found big overhead of SELinux in read/write on some CPUs,
and trying tuning.
There were discussion in previous threads.
Part 1:
http://marc.info/?t=11884534341r=1w=2
Part 2:
13 matches
Mail list logo
