On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:36:19AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-08 18:48, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
[...]
> we can keep it as is and mandate the nodes only for ARM64 as you
> suggested.
>
Fine by me.
[...]
> > We have reasons why we can't assume information about cache or power
>
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:36:19AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-08 18:48, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
[...]
> we can keep it as is and mandate the nodes only for ARM64 as you
> suggested.
>
Fine by me.
[...]
> > We have reasons why we can't assume information about cache or power
>
Στις 2018-11-08 17:54, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Στις 2018-11-07 14:06, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
Στις 2018-11-08 17:54, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Στις 2018-11-07 14:06, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
Στις 2018-11-08 18:48, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:52:30PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Στις 2018-11-07 14:28, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
>
> I agree, but we have kernel code using it(arm64/kernel/topology.c). It's
> too late to remove it. But we can always keep to optional if we
Στις 2018-11-08 18:48, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:52:30PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Στις 2018-11-07 14:28, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
>
> I agree, but we have kernel code using it(arm64/kernel/topology.c). It's
> too late to remove it. But we can always keep to optional if we
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:52:30PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-07 14:28, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> >
> > I agree, but we have kernel code using it(arm64/kernel/topology.c). It's
> > too late to remove it. But we can always keep to optional if we move the
> > ARM64 binding as generic
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:52:30PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-07 14:28, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> >
> > I agree, but we have kernel code using it(arm64/kernel/topology.c). It's
> > too late to remove it. But we can always keep to optional if we move the
> > ARM64 binding as generic
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-07 14:06, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > > Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
> > > me that having a device tree
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-07 14:06, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > > Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
> > > me that having a device tree
Στις 2018-11-07 14:28, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
[...]
Mark and Sudeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
me
that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a correct
approach.
Thanks :)
It's not
Στις 2018-11-07 14:28, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
[...]
Mark and Sudeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
me
that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a correct
approach.
Thanks :)
It's not
Στις 2018-11-07 14:06, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
me that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a
correct approach. It's not a device after all and I
Στις 2018-11-07 14:06, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
me that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a
correct approach. It's not a device after all and I
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
[...]
>
> Mark and Sudeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced me
> that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a correct
> approach.
>
Thanks :)
> It's not a device after all and I agree that the
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
[...]
>
> Mark and Sudeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced me
> that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a correct
> approach.
>
Thanks :)
> It's not a device after all and I agree that the
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
> me that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a
> correct approach. It's not a device after all and I agree that the
> device tree shouldn't
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:31:34AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Mark and Sundeep thanks a lot for your feedback, I guess you convinced
> me that having a device tree binding for the scheduler is not a
> correct approach. It's not a device after all and I agree that the
> device tree shouldn't
Στις 2018-11-06 18:20, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > > This patch series adds
Στις 2018-11-06 18:20, Mark Rutland έγραψε:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > > This patch series adds
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > > Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > > > This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > > Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > > > This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > > > This patch series adds the cpu
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > > > This patch series adds the cpu
Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
> both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested
Στις 2018-11-06 16:13, Sudeep Holla έγραψε:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
> both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
> > both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
> > QEMU & Unleashed board.
> >
>
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:39PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
> > This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
> > both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
> > QEMU & Unleashed board.
> >
>
Στις 2018-11-02 23:14, Atish Patra έγραψε:
On 11/2/18 11:59 AM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed
Στις 2018-11-02 23:14, Atish Patra έγραψε:
On 11/2/18 11:59 AM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed
On 11/2/18 11:59 AM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed board.
The idea is based on cpu-map in ARM with
On 11/2/18 11:59 AM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed board.
The idea is based on cpu-map in ARM with
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed board.
The idea is based on cpu-map in ARM with changes related to how
we define SMT systems.
Hello All,
Στις 2018-11-02 01:04, Atish Patra έγραψε:
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed board.
The idea is based on cpu-map in ARM with changes related to how
we define SMT systems.
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed board.
The idea is based on cpu-map in ARM with changes related to how
we define SMT systems. The reason for adopting a similar approach
to ARM as I
This patch series adds the cpu topology for RISC-V. It contains
both the DT binding and actual source code. It has been tested on
QEMU & Unleashed board.
The idea is based on cpu-map in ARM with changes related to how
we define SMT systems. The reason for adopting a similar approach
to ARM as I
36 matches
Mail list logo
