On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 01:12:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> >> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 01:12:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 01:12:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 01:12:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
>> >>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 01:12:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> >> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 01:12:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
>> >>
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the
Hello,
On (09/05/16 11:18), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> If I understand Sergey's point right, he means there is no gain
> to save memory between before and after.
>
> With your approach, you can prevent unnecessary pageout(i.e.,
> uncompressible page swap out) but it doesn't mean you save the
>
Hello,
On (09/05/16 11:18), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> If I understand Sergey's point right, he means there is no gain
> to save memory between before and after.
>
> With your approach, you can prevent unnecessary pageout(i.e.,
> uncompressible page swap out) but it doesn't mean you save the
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
> >>
> >> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> >> of a
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:25:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
> >>
> >> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> >> of a page is really low. So the
Hello Hui,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
> control when it is running.
> In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The
Hello Hui,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
> control when it is running.
> In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
>> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
>> control
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
>> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
>> control when it is running.
>> In my part,
Hello,
On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
>
> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
> control when it is running.
> In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The compression rate
> is
Hello,
On (08/22/16 16:25), Hui Zhu wrote:
>
> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
> control when it is running.
> In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The compression rate
> is
Hi Minchan,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Hui,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
>> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
Hi Minchan,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Hui,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
>> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
>> control when it
Hi Hui,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
> control when it is running.
> In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The
Hi Hui,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
> of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
> control when it is running.
> In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The
Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
control when it is running.
In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The compression rate
is about 40%.
This series of patches make ZRAM can just store
Current ZRAM just can store all pages even if the compression rate
of a page is really low. So the compression rate of ZRAM is out of
control when it is running.
In my part, I did some test and record with ZRAM. The compression rate
is about 40%.
This series of patches make ZRAM can just store
24 matches
Mail list logo