> MIPI has opened the I3C spec [1], it can be downloaded here [2].
Wow, that's good news. And so fast. Congrats and thanks a lot!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:17:45 +0200
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > This patch series is a proposal for a new I3C [1] subsystem.
>
> Nice. Good luck with that!
>
> Some hi-level comments from me related to I2C. I can't say a lot more
> because the specs are not public :(
>
> > - the bu
> > I agree this is the least invasive and also the most compatible
> > approach. The other solution would probably be to have some kind of
> > emulation layer?
>
> Could you detail a bit more what you mean by "emulation layer"?
Not really. That was more a extremly high level approach of what
th
Hi Wolfram,
Le Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:17:45 +0200,
Wolfram Sang a écrit :
> Hi Boris,
>
> > This patch series is a proposal for a new I3C [1] subsystem.
>
> Nice. Good luck with that!
>
> Some hi-level comments from me related to I2C. I can't say a lot more
> because the specs are not public
Hi Boris,
> This patch series is a proposal for a new I3C [1] subsystem.
Nice. Good luck with that!
Some hi-level comments from me related to I2C. I can't say a lot more
because the specs are not public :(
> - the bus element is a separate object and is not implicitly described
> by the maste
This patch series is a proposal for a new I3C [1] subsystem.
This infrastructure is not complete yet and will be extended over
time.
There are a few design choices that are worth mentioning because they
impact the way I3C device drivers can interact with their devices:
- all functions used to se
6 matches
Mail list logo
