On 12/11/2014 02:43 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>> I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at
>> least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use
>> it, and probably more
On 12/11/2014 02:43 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at
least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use
it, and probably more importantly
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at
> least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use
> it, and probably more importantly I'd expect to be able to understand
> why this is DT
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:49:54AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 12/10/2014 05:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >> Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
> >> The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
> >
Hi Mark,
On 12/10/2014 05:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
>> The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
> Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not
Hi Mark,
On 12/10/2014 05:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not looked at
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:49:54AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 12/10/2014 05:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Why, what
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:58:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
I'd expect someone reading the change in the regulator API to have at
least some idea how this fits in with the rest of the API and how to use
it, and probably more importantly I'd expect to be able to understand
why this is DT only.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
> The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not looked at
the code since I don't know what it's supposed to
Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 77 ++
include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 10 +
include/linux/restrack.h
Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 77 ++
include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 10 +
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Regulators supports various methods of lookup.
The patch adds restrack support only to DT based regulators.
Why, what does this mean and how might one use it? I've not looked at
the code since I don't know what it's supposed to
12 matches
Mail list logo
