On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:40 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comment.
> > > This solution looks good to me.
> > > I will change it as your suggestion.
> > >
> > > But, I have a
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:40 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comment.
> > > This solution looks good to me.
> > > I will change it as your suggestion.
> > >
> > > But, I have a question about 'mask
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:40 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> > This solution looks good to me.
> > I will change it as your suggestion.
> >
> > But, I have a question about 'mask out the provided *device virtual*
> > address'.
> > Are lower 16-bits (or
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:40 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> > This solution looks good to me.
> > I will change it as your suggestion.
> >
> > But, I have a question about 'mask out the provided *device virtual*
> > address'.
> > Are lower 16-bits (or
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:40 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> > This solution looks good to me.
> > I will change it as your suggestion.
> >
> > But, I have a question about 'mask out the provided *device virtual*
> > address'.
> > Are lower 16-bits (or
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:40 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> > This solution looks good to me.
> > I will change it as your suggestion.
> >
> > But, I have a question about 'mask out the provided *device virtual*
> > address'.
> > Are lower 16-bits (or
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
> This solution looks good to me.
> I will change it as your suggestion.
>
> But, I have a question about 'mask out the provided *device virtual*
> address'.
> Are lower 16-bits (or 24-bits for JUMP op) of device virtual address the
> same as device physical
霆); Daoyuan Huang (黃道原); Damon Chu (朱峻賢); Josh-YC Liu
> (劉育誠); Glory Hung (洪智瑋); Yong Wu (吴勇)
> Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] CMDQ: Mediatek CMDQ driver
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 18:22 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 18:22 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao
霆); Daoyuan Huang (黃道原); Damon Chu (朱峻賢); Josh-YC Liu
> (劉育誠); Glory Hung (洪智瑋); Yong Wu (吴勇)
> Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] CMDQ: Mediatek CMDQ driver
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao <hs.l...@mediatek.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 18:22 +0800
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 18:22 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> >> On Mon,
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
> This solution looks good to me.
> I will change it as your suggestion.
>
> But, I have a question about 'mask out the provided *device virtual*
> address'.
> Are lower 16-bits (or 24-bits for JUMP op) of device virtual address the
> same as device physical
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 18:22 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> > >
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 18:22 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM,
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Dan,
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks for your
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> > > wrote:
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > >>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Dan,
>> >
>> > Many thanks for your comments and time.
>> > I reply my plan inline.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu,
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Many thanks for your comments and time.
> > I reply my plan inline.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:49 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >> Hi HS,
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Many thanks for your comments and time.
> I reply my plan inline.
>
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:49 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> Hi HS,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay. It is hard to find time to review a >3700 line
>> driver :-o
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Many thanks for your comments and time.
> > I reply my plan inline.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:49 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Dan,
>> >
>> > Many thanks for your comments and time.
>> > I
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Many thanks for your comments and time.
> I reply my plan inline.
>
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:49 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> Hi HS,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay. It is hard to find time to review a
Hi Dan,
Many thanks for your comments and time.
I reply my plan inline.
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:49 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Hi HS,
>
> Sorry for the delay. It is hard to find time to review a >3700 line
> driver :-o in detail
>
> Some review comments inline, although I still do not
Hi Dan,
Many thanks for your comments and time.
I reply my plan inline.
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:49 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Hi HS,
>
> Sorry for the delay. It is hard to find time to review a >3700 line
> driver :-o in detail
>
> Some review comments inline, although I still do not
Hi HS,
Sorry for the delay. It is hard to find time to review a >3700 line
driver :-o in detail
Some review comments inline, although I still do not completely
understand how all that this driver does and how it works.
I'll try to find time to go through this driver in detail again next
Hi HS,
Sorry for the delay. It is hard to find time to review a >3700 line
driver :-o in detail
Some review comments inline, although I still do not completely
understand how all that this driver does and how it works.
I'll try to find time to go through this driver in detail again next
32 matches
Mail list logo