On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 04:14:10PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 10-07-18 16:40:40, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 27-06-18 09:44:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > This is the v2 of RFC based on the feedback I've received so
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 04:14:10PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 10-07-18 16:40:40, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 27-06-18 09:44:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > This is the v2 of RFC based on the feedback I've received so
On Mon 25-06-18 12:34:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/06/2018 10:45, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 25-06-18 10:10:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 25/06/2018 09:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Sun 24-06-18 10:11:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/06/2018 17:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > @@
On 25/06/2018 10:45, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 25-06-18 10:10:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 25/06/2018 09:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Sun 24-06-18 10:11:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 22/06/2018 17:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
> @@ -7215,6 +7216,8 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_ra
On Mon 25-06-18 10:10:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/06/2018 09:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 24-06-18 10:11:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 22/06/2018 17:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> @@ -7215,6 +7216,8 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct
> >>> kvm *kvm,
> >>> apic_add
On 25/06/2018 09:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 24-06-18 10:11:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 22/06/2018 17:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> @@ -7215,6 +7216,8 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct
>>> kvm *kvm,
>>> apic_address = gfn_to_hva(kvm, APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE >> PAGE_SHI
On Sun 24-06-18 10:11:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/06/2018 17:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > @@ -7215,6 +7216,8 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct
> > kvm *kvm,
> > apic_address = gfn_to_hva(kvm, APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > if (start <= apic_address && ap
On 22/06/2018 17:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
> @@ -7215,6 +7216,8 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct kvm
> *kvm,
> apic_address = gfn_to_hva(kvm, APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> if (start <= apic_address && apic_address < end)
> kvm_make_all_cpus_r
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Michal Hocko (2018-06-22 16:02:42)
> > Hi,
> > this is an RFC and not tested at all. I am not very familiar with the
> > mmu notifiers semantics very much so this is a crude attempt to achieve
> > what I need basically. It migh
On Fri 22-06-18 16:36:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Michal Hocko (2018-06-22 16:02:42)
> > Hi,
> > this is an RFC and not tested at all. I am not very familiar with the
> > mmu notifiers semantics very much so this is a crude attempt to achieve
> > what I need basically. It might be completely
On Fri 22-06-18 17:13:02, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> [Adding Felix as well]
>
> Well first of all you have a misconception why at least the AMD graphics
> driver need to be able to sleep in an MMU notifier: We need to sleep because
> we need to wait for hardware operations to finish
11 matches
Mail list logo
