> On Oct 4, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Ben Hutchings
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:30 +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Please review the approach of using small fixed-sized arrays to improve
>> parsing of values like get_options() does.
>>
>>
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Ben Hutchings
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:30 +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Please review the approach of using small fixed-sized arrays to improve
>> parsing of values like get_options() does.
>>
>> This comes to me after fixing an
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:30 +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Please review the approach of using small fixed-sized arrays to improve
> parsing of values like get_options() does.
>
> This comes to me after fixing an overflow in get_options(). See the thread
> for details:
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:30 +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Please review the approach of using small fixed-sized arrays to improve
> parsing of values like get_options() does.
>
> This comes to me after fixing an overflow in get_options(). See the thread
> for details:
Hi guys,
Please review the approach of using small fixed-sized arrays to improve
parsing of values like get_options() does.
This comes to me after fixing an overflow in get_options(). See the thread
for details: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/22/581
If the approach is OK I’ll suggest to replace
Hi guys,
Please review the approach of using small fixed-sized arrays to improve
parsing of values like get_options() does.
This comes to me after fixing an overflow in get_options(). See the thread
for details: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/22/581
If the approach is OK I’ll suggest to replace
6 matches
Mail list logo