Hi Rajendra,
On 15/03/17 03:47, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
> Hey Jon,
>
Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
on how we can move this forward?
>>>
>>> At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and
>>> Stephen more about these related
On 13/03/17 14:42, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 13 March 2017 at 15:09, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Ulf,
>>
>> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> +Björn
>>>
>>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf,
Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for t
Hey Jon,
Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
on how we can move this forward?
At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and
Stephen more about these related issues.
It definitely seems like we need to progress with this somehow,
mean
Hi Geert,
On 13/03/17 14:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> +Björn
>
> On 1
On 13 March 2017 at 15:09, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> +Björn
>>
>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf,
>>>
>>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
>>> on how we can move this forw
Hi Jon,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
+Björn
On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Looks like there is
Hi Geert,
On 13/03/17 14:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> +Björn
>>>
>>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any th
Hi Jon,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> +Björn
>>
>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
>>> on how we can move this forward?
>>
>> At the Linaro Con
Hi Ulf,
On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> +Björn
>
> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf,
>>
>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
>> on how we can move this forward?
>
> At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking
+Björn
On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf,
>
> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
> on how we can move this forward?
At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and
Stephen more about these related issue
Hi Rafael, Kevin, Ulf,
Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
on how we can move this forward?
Cheers
Jon
On 28/02/17 15:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> T
On 02/28/2017 08:48 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
>> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
>> - XUSBB: Device contro
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
>> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
>> - XUSBB: Device c
Hi all,
On 20/09/16 11:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
> - XUSBB: Device controller
> - XUSBC: Host controller
>
> These power doma
On 29/11/16 11:33, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for pointing to my patches, but I would like to clarify a few
> things.
>
> On 2016-11-24 03:30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Jon Hunter writes:
> Howeve
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for pointing to my patches, but I would like to clarify a few things.
On 2016-11-24 03:30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Jon Hunter writes:
However, I would rather the client of
the power-domains specify which power
On 11/22, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Jon Hunter writes:
> >
> >> However, I would rather the client of
> >> the power-domains specify which power-domains they require and
> >> dynamically nested the power-domains at runtime. This is slightly
> >> different t
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 22/11/16 21:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Jon Hunter writes:
>>>
On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
On 22/11/16 21:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Jon Hunter writes:
>>
>>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Kevin, Ulf,
>
> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wro
On 11/22/2016 06:35 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 17 November 2016 at 16:39, Stanimir Varbanov
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Jon Hunter writes:
>
>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Kevin, Ulf,
On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
On 22/11/16 18:26, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Jon Hunter writes:
>
>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Kevin, Ulf,
On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> ..
Jon Hunter writes:
> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin, Ulf,
>>>
>>> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
...
Second, another way of seeing this is
On 22/11/16 13:31, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 22 November 2016 at 12:12, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
>>> There is a design limitation to that, however.
>>>
>>> The PM domain concept really is about intercepting the flow of PM
>>> callbacks for a device in o
On 22 November 2016 at 12:12, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin, Ulf,
>>>
>>> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
...
Second,
On 17 November 2016 at 16:39, Stanimir Varbanov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Hi Jon,
On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rajen
On 16/11/16 12:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Kevin, Ulf,
>>
>> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current
>
Hi,
On 11/17/2016 04:31 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>
> On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Rajendra,
On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>
On 11/16/2016 06:41 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Rajendra,
>>>
>>> On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rajendra,
On 2 November 2016 at 09:56, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Rajendra,
>>
>> On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Rajendra,
On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>>>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Kevin, Ulf,
>
> On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current
>> runtime selected configuration you need to re-configur
Hi Kevin, Ulf,
On 03/11/16 14:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current
> runtime selected configuration you need to re-configure the PM domain
> topology - but the device would still re
On 11/10/16 10:15, Jon Hunter wrote:
...
Second, another way of seeing this is: Depending on the current
runtime selected configuration you need to re-configure the PM domain
topology - but the device would still remain in the same PM domain.
In other words, you would ne
Hi Jon,
On 10/31/2016 04:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rajendra,
>
> On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>> On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Rajendra,
>>>
>>> On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The Tegra124/21
Hi Rajendra,
On 06/10/16 09:43, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Rajendra,
On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
controllers) is partitioned
On 10/10/16 15:04, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 10 October 2016 at 13:18, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
controllers) is partitioned acr
On 10 October 2016 at 13:18, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
>>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
>>> - XUSBA: Super
On 06/10/16 13:22, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
>> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
>> - XUSBB: Device controller
On 20 September 2016 at 12:28, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
> - XUSBB: Device controller
> - XUSBC: Host controller
>
> These power d
On 10/06/2016 01:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rajendra,
>
> On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>> On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
>>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
>>> - XUS
Hi Rajendra,
On 06/10/16 07:04, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
> On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
>> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
>> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
>> - XUSBB: Device
On 09/20/2016 03:58 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
> controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
> - XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
> - XUSBB: Device controller
> - XUSBC: Host controller
>
> These power domains
The Tegra124/210 XUSB subsystem (that consists of both host and device
controllers) is partitioned across 3 PM domains which are:
- XUSBA: Superspeed logic (for USB 3.0)
- XUSBB: Device controller
- XUSBC: Host controller
These power domains are not nested and can be powered-up and down
independen
43 matches
Mail list logo