On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hi Trent,
>
> Patch looks good, just one comment:
>
> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 07:07 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > + use = already_uses(a, b);
> > + if (!use) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "module %s trying to un-use a module, %s,
Hi Trent,
Patch looks good, just one comment:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 07:07 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> + use = already_uses(a, b);
> + if (!use) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "module %s trying to un-use a module, %s, which "
> + "it is not using", a->name,
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:31:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
> > module, there is no record what module
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:31:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
module, there is no record what module called
Hi Trent,
Patch looks good, just one comment:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 07:07 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
+ use = already_uses(a, b);
+ if (!use) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR module %s trying to un-use a module, %s, which
+ it is not using, a-name, b-name);
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
Hi Trent,
Patch looks good, just one comment:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 07:07 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
+ use = already_uses(a, b);
+ if (!use) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR module %s trying to un-use a module, %s, which
+
> From: Andrew Morton
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Add ability to keep track of callers of
> symbol_(get|put)
> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:09:38 -0800
>
>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:31:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> From: Trent
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:31:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> From: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
> module, there is no record what module called symbol_get(). A module
> can
> show up as
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:31:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
module, there is no record what module called symbol_get(). A module
can
show up as having other
From: Andrew Morton
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Add ability to keep track of callers of
symbol_(get|put)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:09:38 -0800
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:31:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Trent Piepho [EMAIL
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 02:31 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> From: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
> module, there is no record what module called symbol_get(). A module
> can
> show up as having other users, but
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 02:31 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
From: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
module, there is no record what module called symbol_get(). A module
can
show up as having other users, but there is no
From: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
module, there is no record what module called symbol_get(). A module
can
show up as having other users, but there is no way to tell who those
users are.
This adds that ability to
From: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When a module uses symbol_get() to increase the ref count of another
module, there is no record what module called symbol_get(). A module
can
show up as having other users, but there is no way to tell who those
users are.
This adds that ability to
14 matches
Mail list logo
