On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 01:42 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> The question is: how much this "generic" pinconf is... well... generic!
>
> This is why I don't really like the concept of generic pinconf; it ends
> up being more: whoever defines something
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
> Deglitch and
> Debounce filters are different features in at91 (even if they pursuit the
> same goal). So I do prefer to let the user choose which feature is preferred
> for his application and add a
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com wrote:
On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
Deglitch and
Debounce filters are different features in at91 (even if they pursuit the
same goal). So I do prefer to let the user choose which feature is preferred
for his
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/27/2013 01:42 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
The question is: how much this generic pinconf is... well... generic!
This is why I don't really like the concept of generic pinconf; it ends
up being more: whoever
On 08/27/2013 01:42 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
>> On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris
On 27/08/2013 09:42, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new
On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter
On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a
On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a
On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter
On 27/08/2013 09:42, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new
On 08/27/2013 01:42 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 27/08/2013 08:16, boris brezillon :
On 27/08/2013 05:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>>> Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
>>> A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
delay (nanoseconds).
Why not use the existing debounce
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
> A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
> delay (nanoseconds).
Why not use the existing debounce property, just with a small delay
specified. It seems like
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
delay (nanoseconds).
Why not use the existing debounce property, just with a small delay
specified. It seems like
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
delay (nanoseconds).
Why not use the existing debounce
On 08/26/2013 11:01 AM, boris brezillon wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 26/08/2013 18:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/24/2013 03:35 PM, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
delay
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
delay (nanoseconds).
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt |1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
Add a new parameter to support deglitch filter configuration.
A deglitch filter works like a debounce filter but with a smaller
delay (nanoseconds).
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON b.brezil...@overkiz.com
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt |1 +
20 matches
Mail list logo
