On 03.08.2020 17:16, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:00:36AM +, codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com
> wrote:
>> On 27.07.2020 13:50, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:00:36AM +, codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 27.07.2020 13:50, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:44:57AM +,
On 27.07.2020 13:50, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:44:57AM +, codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com
> wrote:
>> On 24.07.2020 23:52, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:44:57AM +, codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 24.07.2020 23:52, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:39:13PM +0200,
On 24.07.2020 23:52, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:39:13PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>
+-
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:39:13PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > +- pinctrl
> > > + add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus
> > > + recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state
> >
> > I think we
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > +- pinctrl
> > + add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus
> > + recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state
>
> I think we should stick with "gpio" only. That is what at91 and imx have
> in their
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:19:01 +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> The I2C GPIO bus recovery properties consist of two GPIOS and one extra
> pinctrl state ("gpio" or "recovery"). Not all are mandatory for recovery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu
> ---
>
> +- pinctrl
> + add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus
> + recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state
I think we should stick with "gpio" only. That is what at91 and imx have
in their bindings. pxa uses "recovery" as a pinctrl state name but I
can't find
The I2C GPIO bus recovery properties consist of two GPIOS and one extra
pinctrl state ("gpio" or "recovery"). Not all are mandatory for recovery.
Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git
10 matches
Mail list logo
