Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] ARM: remove useless guard in smp.c

2013-01-02 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:02:01AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 05:36 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Currently we only provide an implementation of smp_timer_broadcast in > > smp.c if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected. As > > smp_timer_broadcast is only used in

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] ARM: remove useless guard in smp.c

2012-12-21 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 05:36 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: Currently we only provide an implementation of smp_timer_broadcast in smp.c if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected. As smp_timer_broadcast is only used in smp.c, smp.c depends on SMP, and GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected by

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] ARM: remove useless guard in smp.c

2012-12-19 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:47:09PM +, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 12/18/12 04:06, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Currently we only provide an implementation of smp_timer_broadcast in > > smp.c if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected. As > > smp_timer_broadcast is only used in smp.c, smp.c depends on

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] ARM: remove useless guard in smp.c

2012-12-18 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/18/12 04:06, Mark Rutland wrote: > Currently we only provide an implementation of smp_timer_broadcast in > smp.c if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected. As > smp_timer_broadcast is only used in smp.c, smp.c depends on SMP, and > GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected by SMP, this is

[RFC PATCH 1/5] ARM: remove useless guard in smp.c

2012-12-18 Thread Mark Rutland
Currently we only provide an implementation of smp_timer_broadcast in smp.c if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected. As smp_timer_broadcast is only used in smp.c, smp.c depends on SMP, and GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is selected by SMP, this is unnecessary. This patch removes the redundant