On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Since you have to patch your DTs anyway, how about putting your
> partitions in a subnode and patch the ofpart code to parse this subnode
> if it is present (see the following patch).
This is the best idea, yes - if we're
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> So my suggestion is to
> 1) search of ofpart subnode in mtd node. If present read address and
> reg from it and search partitions as subnodes of the ofpart node. In
> this case unknown nodes can cause error.
> 2) failing that
On 29 July 2015 at 20:40, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:21:34PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 29 July 2015 at 19:16, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> >> It will not break anything. It will just spam dmesg.
>
>> > I'm confused - if all this change does is to spam dmesg then what's
Hi Michal,
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:19:57 +0200
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The controller-data subnode has no compatible. This can lead to other
> drivers getting confused by it. Add a compatible to make devicetreee
> unambiguous.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> ---
>
On 29 July 2015 at 20:40, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:21:34PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 19:16, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
It will not break anything. It will just spam dmesg.
I'm confused - if all this change does is to
Hi Michal,
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:19:57 +0200
Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
The controller-data subnode has no compatible. This can lead to other
drivers getting confused by it. Add a compatible to make devicetreee
unambiguous.
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Since you have to patch your DTs anyway, how about putting your
partitions in a subnode and patch the ofpart code to parse this subnode
if it is present (see the following patch).
This is the best idea, yes - if we're changing
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
So my suggestion is to
1) search of ofpart subnode in mtd node. If present read address and
reg from it and search partitions as subnodes of the ofpart node. In
this case unknown nodes can cause error.
2) failing that issue a
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:21:34PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 29 July 2015 at 19:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> It will not break anything. It will just spam dmesg.
> > I'm confused - if all this change does is to spam dmesg then what's the
> > point?
> Presumably when your SPI NOR flash
On 29 July 2015 at 19:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 06:19:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > I can't tell from this commit message what the issue you're trying to
>> > fix is, sorry. Nodes without compatible strings are
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 06:19:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I can't tell from this commit message what the issue you're trying to
> > fix is, sorry. Nodes without compatible strings are entirely normal and
> > don't need compatible strings.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 06:19:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsytsem so people
> > can spot that the patch is in
On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsytsem so people
> can spot that the patch is in some way relevant.
>
>> The controller-data subnode has no compatible. This
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsytsem so people
can spot that the patch is in some way relevant.
> The controller-data subnode has no compatible. This can lead to other
> drivers getting confused by it. Add
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 06:19:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsytsem so people
can spot that the patch
On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsytsem so people
can spot that the patch is in some way relevant.
The controller-data subnode has no
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 06:19:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
I can't tell from this commit message what the issue you're trying to
fix is, sorry. Nodes without compatible strings are entirely normal and
don't need
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:21:34PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 19:16, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
It will not break anything. It will just spam dmesg.
I'm confused - if all this change does is to spam dmesg then what's the
point?
Presumably when your SPI
On 29 July 2015 at 19:16, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 06:19:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 16:00, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
I can't tell from this commit message what the issue you're trying to
fix is, sorry. Nodes without
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsytsem so people
can spot that the patch is in some way relevant.
The controller-data subnode has no compatible. This can lead to other
drivers getting confused by it. Add a
20 matches
Mail list logo
