On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:50:48 PDT (-0700), Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:34:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:24:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:07:22AM -0700, Gu
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 03:25:33PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 07:06:51AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 08/24/2018 06:50 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > >>-#include
> > >>+struct mmu_gather;
> > >> static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> > >> {
> > >>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 07:06:51AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/24/2018 06:50 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> >>-#include
> >>+struct mmu_gather;
> >> static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> >> {
> >>flush_tlb_mm(tlb->mm);
> >
> >Bah, didn't spot the dereference so this won
On 08/24/2018 06:50 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
-#include
+struct mmu_gather;
static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
{
flush_tlb_mm(tlb->mm);
Bah, didn't spot the dereference so this won't work either. You basically
just need to copy what I did for arm64 in d475fac957
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:50:48PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I was a bit quick of the mark there. You'll need a forward
> > declaration for the paramater type. Here it is with a commit message,
> > although still untested because I haven't got round to setting up a riscv
> > toolcha
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:34:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:24:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:07:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:47:0
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:24:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:07:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:47:09PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > > The generic tlb_end_vma doe
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:07:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:47:09PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > The generic tlb_end_vma does not call invalidate_range mmu notifier,
> > > and it resets resets th
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:07:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:47:09PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > The generic tlb_end_vma does not call invalidate_range mmu notifier,
> > and it resets resets the mmu_gather range, which means the notifier
> > won't be called on p
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:47:09PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> The generic tlb_end_vma does not call invalidate_range mmu notifier,
> and it resets resets the mmu_gather range, which means the notifier
> won't be called on part of the range in case of an unmap that spans
> multiple vmas.
>
> A
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:47:09PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> The generic tlb_end_vma does not call invalidate_range mmu notifier,
> and it resets resets the mmu_gather range, which means the notifier
> won't be called on part of the range in case of an unmap that spans
> multiple vmas.
>
> A
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:47:09PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> The generic tlb_end_vma does not call invalidate_range mmu notifier,
> and it resets resets the mmu_gather range, which means the notifier
> won't be called on part of the range in case of an unmap that spans
> multiple vmas.
>
> A
The generic tlb_end_vma does not call invalidate_range mmu notifier,
and it resets resets the mmu_gather range, which means the notifier
won't be called on part of the range in case of an unmap that spans
multiple vmas.
ARM64 seems to be the only arch I could see that has notifiers and
uses the ge
13 matches
Mail list logo
