On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:19:48PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> First, I don't have a solution for the ordering of initialization. It
> just happens to work out for me right now.
Okay, I've got a proof-of-concept implementation of delaying secondary
GPU initialization until the i2c can be muxed
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:19:48PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
First, I don't have a solution for the ordering of initialization. It
just happens to work out for me right now.
Okay, I've got a proof-of-concept implementation of delaying secondary
GPU initialization until the i2c can be muxed
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:44:16AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> The "correct" approach is clearly to just have the drm core change the
> >> i2c mux before requesting edid, but that's made difficult because of the
> >> absence of ordering guarantees in initialisation. I don't like quirking
> >>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:44:16AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
The correct approach is clearly to just have the drm core change the
i2c mux before requesting edid, but that's made difficult because of the
absence of ordering guarantees in initialisation. I don't like quirking
this, since
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:23:17PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > As long as it's only apple shipping multi-gpu machines with
> > broken/non-existing vbt, I'll happily stomach the quirk list entries.
> > They're bad, but imo
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> As long as it's only apple shipping multi-gpu machines with
> broken/non-existing vbt, I'll happily stomach the quirk list entries.
> They're bad, but imo the lesser evil.
Doing this via quirks means that we'll always be broken on
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
As long as it's only apple shipping multi-gpu machines with
broken/non-existing vbt, I'll happily stomach the quirk list entries.
They're bad, but imo the lesser evil.
Doing this via quirks means that we'll always be broken on the
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:23:17PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
As long as it's only apple shipping multi-gpu machines with
broken/non-existing vbt, I'll happily stomach the quirk list entries.
They're bad, but imo the lesser
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 07:20:31PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> > I like this approach more - the only other
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> > I like this approach more - the only other solution I see is to ask the
>> > currently active driver
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > I like this approach more - the only other solution I see is to ask the
> > currently active driver (i.e. radeon) at bootime for the right mode. Which
> > sounds
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I like this approach more - the only other solution I see is to ask the
> currently active driver (i.e. radeon) at bootime for the right mode. Which
> sounds much more hellish and fragile ...
The "correct" approach is clearly to
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 11:57:27AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:27:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:24:51AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> >
> > > This is one of the things I wasn't so sure about. There are various
> > > checks in
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 11:57:27AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:27:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:24:51AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
This is one of the things I wasn't so sure about. There are various
checks in intel_lvds_init()
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
I like this approach more - the only other solution I see is to ask the
currently active driver (i.e. radeon) at bootime for the right mode. Which
sounds much more hellish and fragile ...
The correct approach is clearly to just
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
I like this approach more - the only other solution I see is to ask the
currently active driver (i.e. radeon) at bootime for the right mode. Which
sounds much
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
I like this approach more - the only other solution I see is to ask the
currently active
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:14:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
I like this approach more
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 07:20:31PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:18:38PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:27:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:24:51AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
>
> > This is one of the things I wasn't so sure about. There are various
> > checks in intel_lvds_init() that can cause it to bail out before we try
> > to get the
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:27:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:24:51AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
This is one of the things I wasn't so sure about. There are various
checks in intel_lvds_init() that can cause it to bail out before we try
to get the EDID, and I
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:24:51AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> This is one of the things I wasn't so sure about. There are various
> checks in intel_lvds_init() that can cause it to bail out before we try
> to get the EDID, and I don't fully understand all of them. If non-laptop
> machines are
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:14:16PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:02:19AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > Some Apple hybrid graphics machines do not have the LVDS panel connected
> > to the integrated GPU at boot and also do not supply a VBT. The LVDS
> > connector is
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:02:19AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> Some Apple hybrid graphics machines do not have the LVDS panel connected
> to the integrated GPU at boot and also do not supply a VBT. The LVDS
> connector is not registered as a result, making it impossible to support
> graphics
Some Apple hybrid graphics machines do not have the LVDS panel connected
to the integrated GPU at boot and also do not supply a VBT. The LVDS
connector is not registered as a result, making it impossible to support
graphics switching.
This patch changes intel_lvds_init() to register the connector
Some Apple hybrid graphics machines do not have the LVDS panel connected
to the integrated GPU at boot and also do not supply a VBT. The LVDS
connector is not registered as a result, making it impossible to support
graphics switching.
This patch changes intel_lvds_init() to register the connector
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:02:19AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
Some Apple hybrid graphics machines do not have the LVDS panel connected
to the integrated GPU at boot and also do not supply a VBT. The LVDS
connector is not registered as a result, making it impossible to support
graphics
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:14:16PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:02:19AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
Some Apple hybrid graphics machines do not have the LVDS panel connected
to the integrated GPU at boot and also do not supply a VBT. The LVDS
connector is not
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:24:51AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
This is one of the things I wasn't so sure about. There are various
checks in intel_lvds_init() that can cause it to bail out before we try
to get the EDID, and I don't fully understand all of them. If non-laptop
machines are
30 matches
Mail list logo
