- On Oct 12, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 11/10/18 20:42, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20
- On Oct 12, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 11/10/18 20:42, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20
On 11/10/18 20:42, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
>>> wrote:
On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu
On 11/10/18 20:42, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
>>> wrote:
On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM,
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM,
On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>> On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
>>> wrote:
On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu
On 11/10/18 17:37, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>> On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
>>> wrote:
On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
In order to integrate rseq into
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
In order to integrate rseq into
On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
>>> counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI
On 11/10/18 16:13, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
>>> counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
>> counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI so many rseq users can be
>> linked into the same
- On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
> On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
>> counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI so many rseq users can be
>> linked into the same
On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
> counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI so many rseq users can be
> linked into the same application (e.g. librseq and glibc). The
> reference count ensures that rseq
On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
> counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI so many rseq users can be
> linked into the same application (e.g. librseq and glibc). The
> reference count ensures that rseq
In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI so many rseq users can be
linked into the same application (e.g. librseq and glibc). The
reference count ensures that rseq syscall registration/unregistration
happens only for the
In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI so many rseq users can be
linked into the same application (e.g. librseq and glibc). The
reference count ensures that rseq syscall registration/unregistration
happens only for the
18 matches
Mail list logo