- On Nov 1, 2018, at 11:00 PM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:57 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> wrote:
>>
>> > I think the graceful recovery is to simply return:
>> >
>> > if (WARN_ON(cond))
>> > return;
>> >
>> > is better than ju
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:57 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
>
> > I think the graceful recovery is to simply return:
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(cond))
> > return;
> >
> > is better than just
> >
> > BUG_ON(cond);
> >
> > As that's what Linus made pretty clear at the Maintainer's Su
- On Nov 1, 2018, at 7:46 PM, rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:21:12 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> Mathieu,
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>
>> > It is encouraged to warn and return rather than use BUG_ON() when
>> > the condition
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:21:12 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Mathieu,
>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > It is encouraged to warn and return rather than use BUG_ON() when
> > the condition can be recovered from in ways that are more graceful than
> > halting the whole sy
Mathieu,
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> It is encouraged to warn and return rather than use BUG_ON() when
> the condition can be recovered from in ways that are more graceful than
> halting the whole system.
You're failing to desribe how that graceful recovery works.
Thanks,
It is encouraged to warn and return rather than use BUG_ON() when
the condition can be recovered from in ways that are more graceful than
halting the whole system.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt
CC: Sergey Senozhatsky
CC: Matthew Wilcox
CC: "Paul E. McKenney"
CC
6 matches
Mail list logo