On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:52 PM Chris Chiu wrote:
> You mean moving the ratr_index to be the 4th function parameter of
> update_rate_mask which has 2 candidates rtl8xxxu_update_rate_mask
> and rtl8xxxu_gen2_update_rate_mask? I was planning to keep the
> rtl8xxxu_update_rate_mask the same because
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:22 AM Larry Finger wrote:
>
> On 5/29/19 12:03 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
> > We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
> > The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
> > They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:12 AM Daniel Drake wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:03 PM Chris Chiu wrote:
> > + /*
> > +* Single virtual interface permitted since the driver supports
> > STATION
> > +* mode only.
>
> I think you can be a bit more explicit by
On 5/29/19 12:03 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
iperf (as a client to an ethernet-connected server) gets
Hi Chris,
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:03 PM Chris Chiu wrote:
> + /*
> +* Single virtual interface permitted since the driver supports
> STATION
> +* mode only.
I think you can be a bit more explicit by saying e.g.:
Only one virtual interface permitted because only STA
We have 3 laptops which connect the wifi by the same RTL8723BU.
The PCI VID/PID of the wifi chip is 10EC:B720 which is supported.
They have the same problem with the in-kernel rtl8xxxu driver, the
iperf (as a client to an ethernet-connected server) gets ~1Mbps.
Nevertheless, the signal strength is
6 matches
Mail list logo
