On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:41:04PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:56:14 -0400 Gregory Price
> wrote:
> > Do you have test results which enable only DAMOS_MIGRATE_COLD actions
> > but not DAMOS_MIGRATE_HOT actions? (and vice versa)
> >
> > The question I have
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 22:41:04 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
[...]
> To explain this, I better share more test results. In the section of
> "Evaluation Workload", the test sequence can be summarized as follows.
>
> *. "Turn on DAMON."
> 1. Allocate cold memory(mmap+memset) at DRAM node, then make
Hi Gregory,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:56:14 -0400 Gregory Price
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:08:49PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > posted at [1].
> >
> > 1. YCSB zipfian distribution read only workload
> >
Hi SeongJae,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:28:00 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hello Honggyu,
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:08:49 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
>
> > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > posted at [1].
> >
> > It says there is no implementation of the
Hello Honggyu,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:08:49 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> posted at [1].
>
> It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
> are made. This RFC is about its implementation for
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:08:49PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> posted at [1].
>
> 1. YCSB zipfian distribution read only workload
> memory pressure with cold memory on node0 with 512GB of local DRAM.
>
There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
posted at [1].
It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
are made. This RFC is about its implementation for physical address
space.
Changes from RFC v2:
1. Rename DAMOS_{PROMOTE,DEMOTE}
7 matches
Mail list logo
