Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] DAMON based tiered memory management for CXL memory

Hi SeongJae, On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:28:00 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote: > Hello Honggyu, > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:08:49 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote: > > > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously > > posted at [1]. > > > > It says there is no implementation of the

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] DAMON based tiered memory management for CXL memory

Hello Honggyu, On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:08:49 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote: > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously > posted at [1]. > > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action > are made. This RFC is about its implementation for

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] DAMON based tiered memory management for CXL memory

On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:08:49PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote: > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously > posted at [1]. > > 1. YCSB zipfian distribution read only workload > memory pressure with cold memory on node0 with 512GB of local DRAM. >

[RFC PATCH v3 0/7] DAMON based tiered memory management for CXL memory

There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously posted at [1]. It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action are made. This RFC is about its implementation for physical address space. Changes from RFC v2: 1. Rename DAMOS_{PROMOTE,DEMOTE}